Towards Structuring and Updating the Typology of Semi-Presidentialism Based on the Peculiarities of Dualism, Party Affiliation and Responsibility of the Executives and the Composition of Legislatures

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2019.40.26-33

Abstract

The article clarifies that the typology of semi-presidentialism, which outlines the real powers of political institutions and the peculiarities of relations among them in the triangle “president–prime minister/cabinet–parliament”, was initiated to place the institutions of president and prime minister in the environment of the distribution of powers and responsibilities in the executive and party composition of legislatures. Thus, it was recorded that semi-presidentialism can be represented in the form of the systems of both unified and divided government, as well as their variational derivatives. Accordingly, it was found that the functionality and dynamics of semi-presidentialism are dependent both on constitutional norms and political factors. Simultaneously, the study primarily focuses on the updated and expanded theorization of the typology of semi-presidentialism based on the peculiarities of dualism, party affiliation and responsibility of the executives and the composition of legislatures. As a result, it argues that semi-presidentialism (based on presidential party positioning against the types of cabinets and the parameters of inter-party and intra-party relations) should be typified on the fully or partly unified majority systems, fully or partly unified minority systems, divided majority systems and divided minority systems, which provide various political implications. In addition, the study shows that such a logic and construction of different types of semi-presidentialism is of utmost importance, since it allows to recognize the various effects and consequences of the analyzed system of government, including its prevalence and statistics, stability and conflicts, as well as correlations with different types of political regimes.

Keywords: semi-presidentialism, system of government, dualism, party affiliation and responsibility of the executives, composition of legislature, unified and divided systems.

Author Biography

Vitaliy Lytvyn, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine

Doctor of Political Science, Associate Professor of Political Science

References

1.        Lytvyn, V. (2017), «Systema unifikovanoi menshosti yak variatyvnyi riznovyd napivprezydentalizmu: perevirka dotsilnosti vyokremlennia ta kontseptualizatsii», In: Tezy zvitnoi naukovoi konferentsii filosofskoho fakultetu, TzOV «Trek-LTD», pp. 117-122.
2.        Duverger, M. (1980), “A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government”, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 165-187.
3.        Election 1975. Parliamentary Elections. Finland, Döring, H., Manow, P. (Eds.) Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies. [online] ParlGov. Available from http://www.parlgov.org/explore/fin/election/1975-09-22/ [Accessed 10.09.2019].
4.        Frison-Roche, F. (2005), Le “modèle semi-présidentiel” comme instrument de la transition en Europe post-communiste: Bulgarie, Lituanie, Macédoine, Pologne, Roumanie et Slovénie. Bruylant.
5.        Garrido, A. (2009), “Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy: A Comparative Perspective”, In: World Congress of the International Political Science Association, IPSA Santiago de Chile, 36 pp.
6.        Martinez, R. (1999), “Semi-Presidentialism: A Comparative Study”, In: ECPR Joint Sessions (March 26-31, 1999), Mannheim, 56 pp.
7.        Miettunen III 1976. Governments. Finland, In: Döring, H., Manow, P. (Eds.) Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies. [online] ParlGov. Available from http://www.parlgov.org/explore/fin/cabinet/1976-09-29/ [Accessed 10.09.2019].
8.        Nica, B. (1998), Comparative Institutional Analysis of Post-Communist Semi-Presidential Systems: Prospectus. Central European University.
9.        Pasquino, G. (1997), “Nomination: Semi-presidentialism: A Political Model at Work”, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 128-146.
10.    Sartori, G. (1997) Comparative Constitutional Engineering. An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. New York University Press.
11.    Skach, C. (2005), “Constitutional origins of dictatorship and democracy”, Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 347-368.
12.    Skach, C. (2007), “The «newest» separation of powers: semi-presidentialism”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 93-121.
13.    Strøm, K. (1990) Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge University Press.

Published

2019-12-15

How to Cite

Lytvyn, V. (2019). Towards Structuring and Updating the Typology of Semi-Presidentialism Based on the Peculiarities of Dualism, Party Affiliation and Responsibility of the Executives and the Composition of Legislatures. Modern Historical and Political Issues, (40), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2019.40.26-33