The Method for Evaluation and Comparison the Strength of Presidents from the Position of Areas of Powers: Theorization and Approbation on the Example of the Countries of Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2020.42.121-135Keywords:
president, powers of presidents, strength of presidents, areas of powers, potential, the methods for evaluation and comparison the strength of presidents, the countries of AfricaAbstract
The article is devoted to analyzing preconditions, theoretical and methodological principles of the study of the strength of presidents as well as to consideration the most common approaches in this context. The authors outlined the evolution of formation and analyzed the most common classical and modern methods of evaluation and comparison the strength of presidents, based on which they identified their main common features and parameters. It was stated that the existing methods of evaluation the strength of presidents are not always relevant in a universalist context, since they had been often developed for regional and cross-national context. In contrast, the article actualizes the universal approach to the development of a method for evaluation and comparison the strength of presidents, which is derived from the evidence of the problem of delineation exclusively the formalized (formal) powers of presidents in the existing methods. With this in mind, the research proposes, theorizes and testes the author’s method for evaluation and comparison the strength of presidents based on the positions and powers of the heads of state in various areas of their authority and potential for their implementation. To solve this problem, the researchers initially outlined and systematized the logics of forming the analytical blocks of indicators and criteria for evaluation and comparison the strength of presidents, as well as the mechanism for counting it. As a result, with the help of the chosen logics and counting mechanism, the scientists have substantiated the option of solving the problem of formal delineation of presidential strength. After that, the method was verified on the example of comparison the constitutionalized powers of presidents in African countries as in a region that had not traditionally been subjected to such studies. In addition, the results of African countries were compared with those from “Freedom in the World” by “Freedom House”, which correlated the strength of presidents, the systems of government and the types of political regimes.
References
Zaznaev, O. (2005), “Izmerenye prezydentskoi vlasty”, Uchenye zapisky Kazanskoho hosudarstvennoho unyversiteta. Seryia: Humanytarnye nauky, T. 147 Kn. 1, ss. 4-21.
Zaznaev, O. (2007), “Indeksnyi analiz poluprezydentskykh hosudarstv Evropy i postsovetskoho prostranstva”, Polis: Politicheskye issledovanyia, No. 2, ss. 146-164.
Lytvyn, V. (2018) Atrybuty ta riznovydy napivprezydentskoi systemy pravlinnia v Yevropi: instytutsiino-protsesualnyi i politychno-povedinkovyi aspekty. Lvivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Ivana Franka, Lviv.
Osadchuk, I. (2012), “Prezydentsializatsiia system instytutiv vykonavchoi vlady u krainakh SND: indeksnyi analiz ta politychna praktyka”, Filosofiia i politolohiia v konteksti suchasnoi kultury, No. 22, ss. 159-166.
Hellman, J. (1996), “Konstitutsii i ekonomycheskaia reforma v perekhodnyi period”, Konstytutsionnoe pravo: vostochnoevropeiskoi obozrenye, Vol 2 No. 15.
Armingeon, K. and Careja, R. (2008), Comparative Data Set for 28 Post-Communist Countries, 1989–2007 [online]. Institute of Political Science. Available from http://www.cpds-data.org/index.php/data [Accessed 10 June 2020].
Baylis, T. (1996), “Presidents versus Prime Ministers: Shaping Executive Authority in Eastern Europe”, World Politics, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 297-323.
Cheibub, J. (2007) Presidentialism, parliamentarism, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Countries and Territories: Freedom in the World 2020, In: Freedom House [online], Available from https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-world/scores?fbclid=IwAR0fbPTzLDVPiuDhHvzw 27Qi9KI7Yv7wtF7V1gRG3t2pOnwYtWBdjcSZq2U [Accessed 10 June 2020].
Doyle, D. and Elgie, R. (2016), “Maximizing the Reliability of Cross-National Measures of Presidential Power”, British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 731-741.
Duverger, M. (1980), “A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government”, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 165-187.
Duverger, M. (1978) Echec au Roi. Albin Michel.
Easter, G. (1997), “Preference for Presidentialism: Post-communist Regime Change in Russia and the NIS”, World Politics, Vol. 49, pp. 184-211.
Fortin, J. (2013), “Measuring Presidential Powers: Some Pitfalls of Aggregate Measurement”, International Political Science Review, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 91-112.
Fruhstorfer, A. (2016), “Recent debates and advances in the scholarly examination of presidential institutions”, French Politics, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 254-271.
Frye, T. (1997), “A Politics of Institutional Choices: Post-Communist Presidencies”, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 523-552.
Hicken, A. and Stoll, H. (2013), “Are All Presidents Created Equal? Presidential Powers and the Shadow of Presidential Elections”, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 291-319.
Holmes, S. (1994), “A Forum on Presidential Powers”, East European Constitutional Review, Vol. 2 No. 4.
Johannsen, L. and Norgaard, O. (2003), “IPA: The Index of Presidential Authority. Explorations into the Measurement and Impact of a Political Institution”, In: ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Edinburgh, 16 pp.
Kounov, A. and Mazo, E. (2004), “Reexamining Presidential Power in the Post-Soviet States”, Stanford University Working Paper.
Krouwel, A. (2003), “Measuring Presidentialism and Parliamentarism: An Application to Central and East European Countries”, Acta Politica, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 333-364.
Lucky, C. (1994), “Table of presidential powers in Eastern Europe”, East European Constitutional Review, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 81-94.
McGregor, J. (1994), “The Presidency in East Central Europe”, RFL/RL Research Report, Vol. 3 No. 2.
Metcalf, L. (2000), “Measuring Presidential Power”, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 33 No. 5, pp. 660-685.
Protsyk, O. (2004), “Ruling with Decrees: Presidential Decree Making in Russia and Ukraine”, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 56 No. 5, pp. 637-660.
Shugart, M. and Carey, J. (1992) Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Siaroff, A. (2003), “Comparative presidencies: the inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary distinction”, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 287-312.
Taghiyev, E. (2006), “Measuring Presidential Power in Post-Soviet Countries”, CEU Political Science Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 11-21.
Tanasescu, I. (2002), “The Presidency in Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparative Analysis Between Poland and Romania”, In: The Contours of Legitimacy in Central Europe: New Approaches in Graduate Studies, Oxford, 21 pp.
Tavits, M. (2009), “Direct Presidential Elections and Turnout in Parliamentary Contests”, Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 62 No. 1, pp. 42-54.
Tavits, M. (2009) Presidents with Prime Ministers: Do Direct Elections Matter?. Oxford University Press.
Tsebelis, G. and Rizova, T. (2007), “Presidential Conditional Agenda Setting in the Former Communist Countries”, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 40 No. 10, pp. 1155-1182.
Zaznaev, O. (2014), “Measuring Presidential Power: A Review of Contemporary Methods”, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 5 No. 14, pp. 569-573.
Zaznaev, O. (2015), “Measuring Presidential Power in Post-Communist Countries: Rectification of Mistakes”, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 443-449.
