Synthetic Dimensions of the Potential of the Western Ukrainian People’s Republic

Authors

  • Ivan Monolatii Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2022.45.228-246

Keywords:

potential of the state, modeling, balance of power, diplomacy, Western Ukrainian People`s Republic

Abstract

The article analyzes the specifics of synthetic measurements of state potential on the example of the Western Ukrainian People's Republic (WUPR). The author of the study suggests that modeling the potential of the Western Ukrainian People’s Republic will enable modern historiography of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1914–1923 to elucidate the morphology of state power by elucidating the nature of political power, the functioning of the state body, its strategic goals, etc. in its western Ukrainian segment. The main research models of Western scientists of the second half of the 20 – early 21th centuries are clarified on identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the state’s potential, in particular in the field of international relations: Clifford Herman, Wilhelm Fucks, Ray Klein and Ahmet Davutoğlu. The potential of the WUPR is also considered on the basis of studying the models of gravity, stratification and escalation / de-escalation, which made it possible to clarify the WUPR’s place in the system of international relations and collective security of the early 20th century. It is established that the model of gravity in the case of Western Ukraine diplomacy, in particular during its emigration period, can only partially indicate a certain cultural and / or ideological influence on the balance of international relations, and the “gravitational field” of Western Ukraine was in postwar Europe. An important feature of the stratification model is the prestige of the WUPR in the international arena, which has become the only and common interest of the united Ukrainian People’s Republic. The model of escalation / de-escalation in the realities of Western Ukraine shows that this Ukrainian state and foreign policy activity in the coordinate system of contemporary international relations was located between two points – between absolute peace and absolute war – in the context of the Polish-Ukrainian war of 1918–1919 for Eastern Galicia. According to the author, the most logical in relation to the imagined model of the potential of the WUPR was the escalation from the point of view of the stronger side (Poles), in particular in view of the escalation of armaments. It acted in conditions of asymmetric imbalance: the weaker side (Ukrainians) shifted the “difficulty” of escalation to ideological and moral-ideological problems.

Author Biography

Ivan Monolatii, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University

Doctor of Political Science, Professor of the Department of Politology

References

Aron, R. (2000), Myr i viina mizh natsiiamy; (transl.). V. Shovkun, Z. Borysiuk, H. Filipchuk. Kyiv. [In Ukrainian]

Vitenko, M. (2019), Informatsiina viina proty Zakhidno-Ukrainskoi Narodnoi Respubliky. Zakhidno-Ukrainska Narodna Respublika 1918–1923. Entsyklopediia. T. 2 (Z–O), Ivano-Frankivsk, р. 121. [In Ukrainian]

Hon, M. (2006), Osoblyvosti mizhetnichnoi vzaiemodii v konteksti politychnykh protsesiv na zakhidnoukrainskykh zemliakh u mizhvoiennyi period. Rivne. [In Ukrainian]

Goldelman, S. (1921), Lysty zhydivskoho sotsiial-demokrata pro Ukrainu. Materiialy do istorii ukrainsko-zhydivskykh vidnosyn za chas revoliutsii. Viden. [In Ukrainian]

Diialnist UNR 1920–1930 rokiv mynuloho storichchia v arkhivnykh dokumentakh rozvidky, (2019). (Chastyna I). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian]

Kaminskyi, A. (1977), Do perspektyv nashoi polityky. B. m. v. [In Ukrainian]

Kuhutiak, M., Lytvyn, M. (2019), Zakhidno-Ukrainska Narodna Respublika. Zakhidno-Ukrainska Narodna Respublika 1918–1923. Entsyklopediia. T. 2 (Z–O), Ivano-Frankivsk, р. 54–64.

Kuzma, O. (1960), Lystopadovi dni 1918 r. Iz shkitsamy. Druhe vyd. Niu-York. [In Ukrainian]

Kuchabskyi, V. (2015), Zakhidna Ukraina u borotbi z Polshcheiu ta bilshovyzmom u 1918–1923 rokakh; (transl.). T. Lisna, Lviv. [In Ukrainian]

Levytskyi, K. (1938), Dyplomatychna diialnist Z.U.N.R. (1918–1923) Litopys Chervonoi Kalyny. Lviv, ch. 11, р. 3. [In Ukrainian]

Lypynskyi, V. (1954), Lysty do Brativ-Khliborobiv. Pro ideiu i organizatsiiu ukrainskoho monarkhizmu. Pysani 1919–1926 r. Niu – York. [In Ukrainian]

Lozynskyi, M. (1922), Halychyna v rr. 1918–1920. Viden. [In Ukrainian]

M. Irchan, (1925), V burianakh. Spomyny z hromadianskoi viiny na Ukraini. Chast druha. Toronto. [In Ukrainian]

Monolatii, I. (2008), Avstroloializm yak «taktyka ochikuvannia» etnonatsionalnykh spilnot zakhidnoukrainskoho rehionu. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen im. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy, vyp. 41, Kyiv, p. 156–166. [In Ukrainian]

Monolatii, I. (2020), Zoosad revoliutsii. Zakhidnoukrainska derzhavnist 1918–1923 rokiv i teorii vypadkovostei 20 – pochatku 21 storich. Ivano-Frankivsk. [In Ukrainian]

Monolatii, I. (2019), Potentsiial ZUNR: vymiriaty ne mozhna modeliuvaty? [Online] http://www.historians.in.ua/index.php/en/dyskusiya/2693-ivan-monolatij-taksonimiya-sili-potentsiyalu-zakhidnoukrajinskoji-narodnoji-respubliki-5-potentsiyal-zunr-vimiryati-ne-mozhna-modelyuvati (Accessed: 28 January 2022) [In Ukrainian]

Monolatii, I. (2008), «Proshchannia z videnstvom»: kinets Dunaiskoi monarkhii i proholoshennia ZUNR, Ukraina: kulturna spadshchyna, natsionalna svidomist, derzhavnist, vyp. 18, Lviv, p. 30–38. [In Ukrainian]

Monolatii, I. (2020). Syla ZUNR: vybrani pytannia potentsialu, bezpeky i dyplomatii derzhavy, Ivano-Frankivsk. [In Ukrainian]

Monolatii, I., Velykochyi, V., Lysenko, O. (2021), Terytoriia ZUNR. Zakhidno-Ukrainska Narodna Respublika 1918–1923. Entsyklopediia. T. 4 (T–Ia). Ivano-Frankivsk, p. 36–41. [In Ukrainian]

Pavlyshyn, O. (2000), Sotsialno-politychnyi portret ukrainskoho provodu Halychyny ta Bukovyny v revoliutsii 1918–1919 rr. Ukraina moderna, ch. 4/5, p. 187–245. [In Ukrainian]

Smit, E. D. (2010), Kulturni osnovy natsii. Iierarkhiia, zapovit i respublika; (transl.) P. Tarashchuk. Kyiv. [In Ukrainian]

Tychka, H.-M. (2020), Predstavnytstva Zakhidno-Ukrainskoi Narodnoi Respubliky v m. Paryzh. Zakhidno-Ukrainska Narodna Respublika 1918–1923. Entsyklopediia. T. 3 (P–S). Ivano-Frankivsk, p. 240–241. [In Ukrainian]

(ed.) Karpenko, O. (2001), Zakhidno-Ukrainska Narodna Respublika 1918–1923. Dokumenty i materialy u 5-ty tomakh. T. 1, Ivano-Frankivsk. [In Ukrainian]

(ed.) Karpenko, O. (2005), Zakhidno-Ukrainska Narodna Respublika 1918–1923. Dokumenty i materialy u 5-ty tomakh. T. 3, kn. 1, Ivano-Frankivsk. [In Ukrainian]

(ed.) Karpenko, O. (2009), Zakhidno-Ukrainska Narodna Respublika 1918–1923. Dokumenty i materialy u 5-ty tomakh. T. 5, kn. 1, Ivano-Frankivsk. [In Ukrainian]

(ed.) Karpenko, O. (2011), Zakhidno-Ukrainska Narodna Respublika 1918–1923. Dokumenty i materialy u 5-ty tomakh. T. 5, Kn. 2, Ivano-Frankivsk. [In Ukrainian]

(ed.) Karpenko, O. (2013), Zakhidno-Ukrainska Narodna Respublika 1918–1923. Dokumenty i materialy u 5-ty tomakh. T. 5, Kn. 3, Ivano-Frankivsk. [In Ukrainian]

Tsependa, I. (2019), Dyplomatiia ZUNR. Zakhidno-Ukrainska Narodna Respublika 1918–1923. Entsyklopediia. T. 2 (Z–O). Ivano-Frankivsk, p. 545–550. [In Ukrainian]

Tsependa, I. (2020), Predstavnytstvo Zakhidno-Ukrainskoi Narodnoi Respubliky v m. Berlin. Zakhidno-Ukrainska Narodna Respublika 1918–1923. Entsyklopediia. T. 3 (P–S). Ivano-Frankivsk, p. 241. [In Ukrainian]

Tsependa, I. (2020), Predstavnytstvo Zakhidno-Ukrainskoi Narodnoi Respubliky v m. Praha. Zakhidno-Ukrainska Narodna Respublika 1918–1923. Entsyklopediia. T. 3 (P–S). Ivano-Frankivsk, p. 241–243. [In Ukrainian]

Chubatyi, M. (1987), Derzhavnyi lad na Zakhidnii Oblasty Ukrainskoi Narodnoi Republyky. U poshukakh istorychnoi pravdy. Zbirnyk na poshanu Mykoly Chubatoho 1889–1975. Niu-York – Paryzh – Sydnei – Toronto, p. 1–50. [In Ukrainian]

Shankovskyi, L. (1974), Ukrainska Halytska Armiia. Voienno-istorychna studiia. Vinnipeg. [In Ukrainian]

Shukhevych, S. (1929), Spomyny z Ukrainsko-Halytskoi Armii (1918–1920). Chastyna I. Vid lystopada 1918 do kvitnia 1919. Lviv. [In Ukrainian]

Aslanli, K. (2009), Geopolitical and Human Factor, https://www.turansam.org/makale.php?id=859 Дата звертання: 28.01.2022 р.

Carlson, L. J. (1995), The Theory of Escalation and International Conflict. The Journal of Conflict Resolution. Vol. 39, No. 3, р. 511–534.

Cline, R. S. (1977), World Power Assessment 1977. A Calculus of Strategic Drift. Boulder, Col.

Cline, R. S. (1980), World Power Trends and US Foreign Policy for the 1980s. Boulder, Col.

Davutoğlu, A. (2001), Stratejik Derinlik: Türkiye`nin uluslararasi komunu. Istanbul.

Fucks, W. (1965), Formeln zur Macht, Prognosen über Völker, Wirtschaft, Potentiale. Stuttgart.

Fucks, W. (1978), Mächte von Morgen. Kraftfelder, Tendenzen, Konsequenzen. Stuttgart.

German, F. C. (1960), A Tentative Evaluation of World Power. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 4 (issue 1), р. 138–144.

Haynes, K. E., & Fotheringham, A. S. (1985). Gravity and Spatial Interaction Models. Reprint. Edited by Grant Ian Thrall. WVU Research Repository, 2020. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/rri-web-book/16/ Дата звертання: 28.01.2022 р.

Imam M. Xierali & Lin Liu, (2006), The Effect of Power and Space on Foreign Diplomatic Presence in the United States: a Spatial Modeling Approach. Geographic Information Sciences, Vol. 12(2), р. 53–63.

Kahn, H. (1965), On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios. New York.

Keene, E. (2013), Social Status, Social Closure and the Idea of Europe as a ‘Normative Power’. European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 19, No. 4. P. 939–956.

Keene, E. (2013), The Naming of Powers. Cooperation & Conflict. Vol. 48, No. 2, р. 268–282.

Knorr, K. (1970), Military Power and Potential. Lexington, MA.

Leng, R. J. (2004), Escalation Competing Perspectives and Empirical Evidence. International Studies Review. Vol. 6, No. 4, р. 51–64.

Morton R. B. (1999), Methods and Models. A Guide to the Empirical Analyses of Formal Models in Political Science. Cambridge.

Papp, D. S. (1984), Contemporary International Relations. Framework for Understanding. London – New York.

Xierali, I. M., & Liu, L. (2006), Explaining foreign diplomatic presence in the U.S. with spatial models: a liberal spatial perspective. GeoJournal, Vol. 67(1), р. 85–101.

Published

2022-06-27

How to Cite

Monolatii, I. (2022). Synthetic Dimensions of the Potential of the Western Ukrainian People’s Republic. Modern Historical and Political Issues, (45), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2022.45.228-246