The Category “Sobornist’ of Ukraine” as a Fractal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2023.47.313-325Keywords:
fractal, category, sobornist, statelessness, national statehood, fractal dimensions, regionalism, UkraineAbstract
This article convinced a thesis that the fractal manifestation is also the category sobornist’ (“congregation”). Its fractal nature, firstly, expands the specificity of this imaginary idea of the Ukrainian nation, and secondly, it makes it possible to highlight and structure certain nation-building codes as a system of expectations that function in the Ukrainian “congregational” space. The proposed vision is that the properties of fractals as an objective process vary from clear regularity to chaos, the category of “orderliness” as a fractal demonstrates, on the one hand, the borderline “zone of chaos” (statelessness) and, on the other hand, the formation of “order with chaos” (national statehood). The category sobornist’ of in its institutional and structural dimension in Galicia in the middle of the 19th – the first half of the 20th century. can generally correspond to the Sierpinski triangle. Given the self-similarity of the institutions of Ukrainian sobornist’ in the 19th and 20th centuries, it is worth considering Serpinsky’s carpet, which to a greater extent corresponds to the fractal dimension of the phenomenon under study. The Ukrainian cathedral is interpreted as a mutually unambiguous and continuous reflection (from the point of view of Serpinsky’s carpet theory), and therefore its structures are topologically identical (the Main Russian Council of 1848 in Lviv, the Main Ukrainian Council of 1914 in Lviv, the Ukrainian National Council of 1918 in Lviv , the Ukrainian National Council of 1941–1942 in Lviv, the Ukrainian National Council in Kyiv in 1941, the Ukrainian National Council of 1948–1992 in the system of the state center of the Ukrainian People’s Republic in exile). The category sobornist’ in its fractal dimension is also partly an illustration of Nasim Taleb’s theory of antifragility.
References
Adamovych, S. (2009), Sobornist’ ta regional’nyj rozvytok u suspil’no-politychnomu zhytti nezalezhnoyi Ukrayiny. Ivano-Frankivs’k. [In Ukrainian]
Bolyanovs’kyj, A. (2001), Ukrayins’ka Nacional’na Rada. (upor. R. Shust). Dovidnyk z istoriyi Ukrayiny. 2-ge vy`d., doopr. i dopovn. Kyjiv, р. 930. [In Ukrainian]
Bochkovs’kyj, O. I. (1932), Borot’ba narodiv za nacional’ne vyzvolennya. Naciologichni narysy. Podyebrady. [In Ukrainian]
(ed.) Vasyl’chuk, M. (1991), Za volyu Ukrayiny. Symvolichni mogyly sichovym stril’cyam, voyakam UGA i UPA na Kolomyjshhyni. Ivano-Frankivs’k. [In Ukrainian]
Velykočyj, V. (2022), Nacional’na sobornist’ i Ukrajins’ka revoljucija 1914–1923 rr. Istoriohrafični syl’vetky. Ivano-Frankivs’k. [In Ukrainian]
Volodymyr Naddnipryanecz’ (1961), Ukrayins’ka Nacional’a Rada; peredmov. P. Kryvoboka. Myunxen – Nyu-Jork. [In Ukrainian]
Gorobecz, Yu., Kuchko, A., Vavylova, I. (2008), Fraktal’na geometriya u pryrodoznavstvi. Navch. posibn. Kyjiv. [In Ukrainian]
Goyan, I., Storozhuk, S., Velykochyj, V. (2020), Sobornist’: koncept. Zaxidno-Ukrayins’ka Narodna Respublika 1918–1923. Encyklopediya. T. 3 (P–S). Ivano-Frankivs’k, р. 467–472. [In Ukrainian]
Gryshko, V. (1979), Nezavershena sobornist’ i narodzhennya vseukrayinstva. Suchasnist’ (Mjunxen). Ch. 6 (222), р. 81–100. [In Ukrainian]
Gryshko, V. (1979), Shlyax do sobornosty. Suchasnist’ (Mjunxen). Ch. 1 (217), р. 49–66. [In Ukrainian]
Donchenko, O. (2006), Fraktalnist’ psyxiky i sub’yektnist’. Lyudyna – Sub’yekt – Vchynok. Filosofs’ko-psyxologichni studiyi; za red. V. Tatenka. Kyjiv, р. 117–143. [In Ukrainian]
Yednist’ naciyi (1936). Dilo (L’viv), 22 sich., ch. 15. [In Ukrainian]
Zaxidnoukrayins’ka Narodna Respublika 1920-1930-x rokiv XX stolittya v arxivnyx dokumentax, (2021). Kyyiv. [In Ukrainian]
Isayiv, P. (1975), Prychyny upadku ukrayins’koyi derzhavy v knyazhi i kozac’ki chasy. (Vyklady na UKU). Rym. [In Ukrainian]
Kozellek, R. (2005), Mynule majbutnye. Pro semantyku istorychnogo chasu; (transl.). V. Shved. Kyjiv. [In Ukrainian]
Kozellek, R. (2006), Chasovi plasty. Doslidzhennya z teoriyi istoriyi. Zi statteyu Gansa-Georga Gadamera; (transl.). V. Shved. Kyjiv. [In Ukrainian]
Kosyk, V. (1993), Ukrayina pid chas Drugoyi svitovoyi vijny 1938–1945. Kyjiv – Paryzh – Nyu-Jork – Toronto. [In Ukrainian]
Kosiv, R. (2009), Ukrayins’ki xorugvy. Kyjiv. [In Ukrainian]
Kostec’kyj, I. (1941), Pryncypy ukrayinstva. Dniprova xvylya (Kremenchuk), 5 lyst., No. 3. [In Ukrainian]
(ed.) Kuhutyak, M. (2004), Ukrayins’ka nacional-demokratiya 1918–1929. Dokumenty i materialy. T. 2. Kyjiv – Ivano-Frankivs’k. [In Ukrainian]
Levyc’kyj, K. (1931, 1968) Velykyj Zryv (Do istoriyi ukrayins’koyi derzhavnosty vid bereznya do lystopada 1918 r. na pidstavi spomyniv ta dokumentiv). L’viv; Nyu Jork. [In Ukrainian]
Levyc’kyj, K. (1928), Istorija Vyzvol’nyx zmahan’ halyc’kyx ukrajinciv z času Svitovoji vijny 1914–1918. Z iljustracijamy na pidstavi spomyniv i dokumentiv. Perša čast’. L’viv. [In Ukrainian]
Levyc’kyj, K. (1926), Istorija polityčnoji dumky halyc’kyx ukrajinciv 1848–1914. Na pidstavi spomyniv. L’viv. [In Ukrainian]
Lypyns’kyj, V. (1926), Lysty do Brativ-Xliborobiv. Pro ideju i organizaciju ukrajins’koho monarxizmu. Pysani 1919–1926 R. Viden’. [In Ukrainian]
Lozyns’kyj, J. (1992), Ukrajins’ke vesillja; oprac. tekstu, upor. i vstup. st. R. Kyrčiva. Kyjiv. [In Ukrainian]
Lotoc’kyj, O. (1935), Avtokefalija. Tom 1. Zasady avtokefaliji. Varšava. [In Ukrainian]
Monolatij, I. (2020), Zoosad revoljuciji. Zaxidnoukrajins’ka deržavnist’ 1918–1923 rokiv i teoriji vypadkovostej XX – počatku XXI storič. Ivano-Frankivs’k. [In Ukrainian]
Monolatij, I. (2008), Ukrajins’ki lehionery. Formuvannja ta bojovyj šljax Ukrajins’kyx Sičovyx Stril’civ, 1914–1918. Kyjiv. [In Ukrainian]
Narodnji xresty v Kolomyjščyni. Zibrav i zrysuvav Hnat Kolcunjak. Materijaly do ukrajins’koji etnologiji, (1919). L’viv. [In Ukrainian]
Odozva do Ruskoho Narodu. Bratja! (1848), Zorja Halycka (L’viv), 15 maja, č. 1. [In Ukrainian]
Pastušenko, T. (2016), Ukrajins’ka Nacional’na Rada v Kyjevi. Encyklopedija istoriji Ukrajiny. Tom: Ukrajina – Ukrajinci. Kn. 2. Kyjiv, р. 616. [In Ukrainian]
Perepyska Kulyša s’ Volodymirom Barvynskym v pervoj polovynуе 1871 hoda (No 38. Sobornoe poslanie Kulyša Halyčanam’), (1898). Kievskaja Staryna (Kyjiv), kn. X, р. 115–117. [In Ukrainian]
Ploxij, S. (2018), Kozac’kyj mif. Istorija i nacijetvorennja v epoxu imperij; (transl.). M. Klymčuk. Xarkiv. [In Ukrainian]
Rajkivs’kyj, I. (2016), Ideja ukrajins’koji sobornosti v pidavstrijs’kij Halyčyni (XIX – počatok XX stolittja). Ivano-Frankivs’k. [In Ukrainian]
(ed.) Savčuk, O. (2020), Ukrajinsʹka abetka. Maljunky Heorhija Narbuta. Xarkiv. [In Ukrainian]
S. J., (1941), Sobornist’ ukrajins’koji naciji. Ukrajins’kyj visnyk (Berlin), 10 serp., č. 22 (66). [In Ukrainian]
Semmo, O. (1989), Sobornist’ (22.I. – 31.VIII.1919 r.). Filjadel’fija. [In Ukrainian]
Taleb, N. N. (2019), Antykryxkist’. Pro (ne)vrazlyve u real’nomu žytti; (transl.) M. Klymčuk. 2-he vyd. Kyjiv. [In Ukrainian]
Taleb, N. N. (2017), Čornyj lebid’. Pro (ne)jmovirne u real’nomu žytti; (transl.). M. Klymčuk. 2-he vyd. Kyjiv. [In Ukrainian]
Ukrajins’ki Sičovi Stril’ci. 1914–1920, (1936). Druhyj naklad. L’viv. [In Ukrainian]
Ukrayins’ka abetka. Malyunky Georgiya Narbuta, (2020); peredm. M. Filevych; upor. O. Savchuk; xudozhn. oform. O. Chekal’. Xarkiv.
Ševčuk, V. (2019), Kozac’ka deržava jak ideja v systemi suspil’no-polityčnoho myslennja XVI–XVIII stolit’. U dvox knyhax. Kn. 1–2. Kyjiv. [In Ukrainian]
Šljaxy nacional’noho vyzvolennja. (Vidčyt O. I. Bočkovsʹkoho na 1-Lystopadovomu Svjati v Podjebradax), (1931). Dilo (L’viv), 26 lyst., č. 266. [In Ukrainian]
Ascher, M. (1991), Ethnomathematics: A Multicultural View of Mathematical Ideas. Pacific Grove, Calif.
D’Ambrosio U. (2001), Etnomatematica. Bologna. [In Italian]
Monołatyj, I. (2011), Ukraińscy Stzelcy Siczowi 1914–1918. Warszawa. [In Polish]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
