The main stages in the formation of the theory of the Second Modern in modern political science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2017.35-36.245-253Abstract
The article analyzes the process of formation, empirical verification and development of the theory of the Second Modern. It is established that it can be described with the help of four stages: the stage of actualization of the renewed essence of social and political; the stage of approval in scientific political science discourse; stage of development; a stage of empirical application and evolution.
It is proved that among the features of the new form of modernity, which could be explained with the help of the theory of the Second Modern, the most important is the ambiguous in its consequences, the transformation of political signs, in particular, the increase in the degree of openness of national political systems, accompanied by growing uncertainty of the functioning of political institutions; strengthening of the absolutization of traditional value-normative systems of political regulation; strengthening the importance of political self-organization of citizens, the formation of new forms of democracy and civil society; the complication and differentiation of the space-time characteristics of the political, in particular, the «glocalization»of space and the «compression»of time.
It is substantiated that the development of the theory of the Second Modern in modern political science reflects the transformation of the political essence in the new social conditions. All analyzed research interpretations of the Second Modernism state that the main direction of political change is the process of deinstitutionalization of political institutions, which takes place in sufficiently diverse forms: through new identification practices destroying the old institution; by forming «normal deviations», that is, due to a change in the notion of norms; changing the functions of the institution; weakening the legal form of institutionalization; changing the basis of legitimization, when instead of legal legitimization, social legitimization becomes more meaningful.
Keywords: Political theory, theory of the Second Modern, stages of the development of the theory, political
References
2. Bek, U. (2001). Chto takoe globalizacija? Oshibki globalizma – otvety na globalizaciju, Moskva, Progress-Tradicija.
3. Interv'ju s professorom Ul'rihom Bekom (2003), Zhurnal sociologii i social'noj antropologii, T. VI, № 1, s. 5–23.
4. Kozlovski, P. (1997). Kul'tura postmoderna: Obshhestvenno-kul'turnye posledstvija tehnicheskogo razvitija, Moskva, Respublika.
5. Kozlovskij, P. Sovremennost' postmoderna (1995), Voprosy filosofii, № 10.
6. Krivosheїn, V. V. (2009). Polіtichna rizikologіja: epіstemologіchnij status, predmetna sfera, analіtichnі іnstrumenti, Dnіpropetrovs'k, Іnnovacіja, 2009.
7. Lemann, G (2010). Iskusstvo refleksivnoj modernosti, Logos, № 4. s. 87–108.
8. Politicheskaja nauka: novіe napravlenija (1999), Pod. red. R. Gudina, H.-D. Klingemanna, Moskva, Veche, 1999.
9. Social'noe: istoki, strukturnye profili, sovremennye vyzovy (2009), Moskva, ROSSPJeN.
10. Habermas, Ju. (2003). Filosofskij diskurs o moderne, Moskva, Ves' Mir.
11. Sheiko, Yu. (2015). Paradyhma politychnoho v refleksyvnomu moderni na prykladi suchasnykh nimetskykh teorii, Kyiv, Natsionalnyi universytet «Kyievo-Mohylianska Akademiia», rezhym dostupu: http://www.ipiend.gov.ua/uploads/dissertations/Sheiko/Sheiko_Dyser_Final.pdf (data perehliadu 17.03.2017)
12. Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya i logika sotsialnykh nauk: Karl Pop-per i ego kritiki (2000) / Sostavleniye D. G. Lakhuti. V. N. Sa-dovskogo i V. K. Finna; perevod s angliyskogo D. G. Lakhuti; vstupitelnaya statia i obshchaya redaktsiya V. N. Sadovskogo; poslesloviye V. K. Finna. Moskva Editorial URSS. 2000.
13. Adam, B., Loon, J. (2000). Introduction: Repositioning Risk; the Challenge for social Theory. In: The Risk Society and Beyond, Lon-don, Sage Publications.
14. Beck, U. (1994). The reinvention of politics: towards a theory of re-flexive modernization. In: Beck, U., Giddens, A., Lash, S. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern So-cial Order, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1994, р. 45–46.
15. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford, Stan-ford University Press.
16. Habermas, J. Die Moderne – ein unvollendetes Projekt. In: Kleine politische Schriften I—IV, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1981, р. 444–464.
17. Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism, Or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, New Left Review. № 146. р. 59–92.
