Balancing Economic Interests and Political Norms: The EU-Belarus Relations through the Perspective of Cross-Border Cooperation Programmes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2024.50.57-68Keywords:
the EU, Belarus, cross-border cooperation, normative power, rational choice theoryAbstract
The article explores the changing cooperation framework between the European Union and Belarus (1994-2022), particularly emphasising cross-border cooperation (CBC) programs. It examines the different motivations of each partner: the EU’s dedication to promoting normative values and democratic standards, contrasted with Belarus’s more pragmatic approach focused on economic benefits and its strategic position between the EU and Russia. Utilising a mixed-methods approach that includes public opinion surveys, program evaluation reports, and recent anonymous in-depth interviews from 2024, the study reveals the complex reasons behind Belarus’s ongoing involvement in CBC programs.
The results indicate that, despite facing significant political and geopolitical challenges, CBC initiatives notably impact Belarus’s socioeconomic landscape. Even with the restrictive political climate and the intricate relationships among Belarus, the EU, and Russia, these programs offer a pathway for regional development and mutual advantage. The study concludes that while the EU’s normative goals may face obstacles, CBC programs promote cross-border unity and improve regional stability.
References
Amnesty International (2024). The State of the World’s Human Rights: April 2024. Index Number: POL 10/7200/2024, retrieved from: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol10/7200/2024/en/ (accessed 5 May 2024).
Anonymous Interview (2024). Unpub-lished raw data #2 (March), #9 (April), #11 (Apri), #12 (April), сonducted as part of research on cross-border cooperation, retrieved from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Bc-4e3JdXOeoLBq_wgQyZ00aWWtkPA-9/edit (accessed 1 December 2024).
Astapenia, R. (2020). "What Belarusians Think About Their Country’s Crisis," Belarusian Polls, retrieved from https://en.belaruspolls.org/analysis/what-belarusians-think (accessed 1 Decembr 2024).
Belarusian Analytical Workroom (2023), Многофакторная структура беларуского общества [Multifactorial Structure of Belarusian Society], retrieved from https://bawlab.eu/BAW_Social_Structure.html (accessed 19 November 2024).
Bosse, G. (2013). "Values versus Security? Assessing the EU’s Pragmatic Engagement with Belarus in the Eastern Partnership Policy". In G. Noutcheva, K. Pomorska, & G. Bosse (Eds.), The European Union and Its Neighbours: Values versus Security in European Foreign Policy. Manchester University Press, pp. 173–194.
Carpenter, M., & Kobets, V. (2020). "What Russia Really Has in Mind for Belarus: And Why Western Leaders Must Act". Foreign Affairs, 8 September, retrieved from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/europe/2020-09-08/what-russia-really-has-mind-belarus (accessed 7 April 2024).
European Commission (2022). "Commission Suspends Cross-Border Cooperation and Transnational Cooperation with Russia and Belarus." Press Release, March 4, Brussels, retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_1526 (accessed 1 June 2024).
European Commission (2023). EU Trade Relationships with Belarus. Facts, figures and latest developments., retrieved from: https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/countries-and-regions/belarus_en (accessed 4 March 2024).
European External Action Service (2020). EU-Belarus Relations. European Union, retrieved from: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/ (accessed 13 February 2024).
European Neighbourhood Instrument 2014-2020 (N.D). Latvia-Lithuania-Belarus ENI CBC Programme 2014-2020, retrieved from: https://www.eni-cbc.eu/llb/en/programme/documents/6/act86 (accessed 10 November 2024).
EU Neighbours East (2020). "Opinion Survey 2020: Belarus", retrieved from https://euneighbourseast.eu/news/opinion-polls/opinion-survey-2020-belarus/ (accessed 12 November 2024).
EU Neighbours East (2022). "Annual Survey 2022: Belarus", retrived from https://euneighbourseast.eu/news/publications/annual-survey-2022-belarus/ (accessed 12 November 2024).
Frear, M. (2020). Belarus under Lukashenka: Adaptive Authoritarianism. Routledge, London.
Human Rights Watch (2024). World Report 2024: Belarus – Events of 2023, retrieved from: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/belarus (accessed 12 September 2024).
Independent Institute of Socioeconomic and Political Studies (IISEPS) (1995–2023). National Polls [Results of public opinion polls on Belarusian attitudes towards the EU, retrieved through correspondence with the editorial team]. Available at: https://www.iiseps.org/?page_id=2056&lang=en (accessed 30 June 2024).
Independent Institute of Socioeconomic and Political Studies (2015). "Trends Of Change In Belarusian Public Opinion", retrieved from https://www.iiseps.org/?p=114&utm&lang=en (accessed 30 June 2024).
Juncker, J. (2017). State of the Union 2017 Address. European Commission, retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_17_3165 (accessed 7 June 2024).
Juutilainen, K. (2021). Assessment of Belarus’ Energy Strategic Situation in 2020–2022 and Its Likely Consequences. NATO Energy Security Centre of Excellence, retrieved from: https://www.enseccoe.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2021-10-assessment-of-belarus-energy-strategic-situation-in-2020-2022-its-likely-consequences.pdf (accessed 9 March 2024).
Kazharski, A. (2021). "Belarus’ New Political Nation? 2020 Anti-Authoritarian Protests as Identity-Building". New Perspectives, 29(1), pp. 69–79, retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X20984340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X20984340
Korosteleva, E. (2012). The European Union and Its Eastern Neighbours: Towards a More Ambitious Partnership? Routledge, retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203128992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203128992
Korosteleva, E. (2013). "Evaluating the Role of Partnership in the European Neighbourhood Policy: The Eastern Neighbourhood." Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 4, pp. 11–36.
Krasner, S. (1999). Sovereignty: Organised Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823260
Manners, I. (2002). "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?" Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), pp. 235–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00353
Ministerstwo Funduszy i Polityki Regionalnej (2015). "Ocena wpływu Programu Sąsiedztwa INTERREG III A/Tacis CBC Polska-Białoruś-Ukraina 2004-2006 na osiągnięcie spójności gospodarczej, społecznej i terytorialnej na obszarze transgranicznym objętym wsparciem," retrieved from: https://www.ewaluacja.gov.pl/strony/badania-i-analizy/archiwum-2004-2015/ocena-wplywu-programu-sasiedztwa-interreg-iii-atacis-cbc-polska-bialorus-ukraina-2004-2006-na-osiagniecie-spojnosci-gospodarczej-spolecznej-i-terytorialnej/ (accessed 15 January 2024).
PL-BY-UA 2014-2020 (N.D). Cross-Border Cooperation Programme Poland-Belarus-Ukraine 2014-2020, retrieved from: https://www.pbu2020.eu/en/pages/287 (accessed 10 November 2024).
Wilson, A. (2016). Belarus: The Last European Dictatorship. Yale University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dmitrij Wolodin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.