The European Union's Arctic Policy: Evolution and the Role of the Scandinavian Member States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2025.51.137-146Keywords:
Arctic policy, EU, Scandinavian states, Arctic region, climate changeAbstract
The process of forming the European Union’s policy towards the Arctic region has been analyzed, the main dimensions of the EU’s presence in the Arctic have been considered, and the contribution of the Scandinavian member states to the implementation of the Union’s Arctic policy has been examined. The article is based on a qualitative analysis of documents, as well as secondary sources (media publications, statistical and analytical materials).
The authors argue that the European Union is one of the key political actors in the European Arctic, making a significant contribution to the regulation, financing, and coordination of Arctic cooperation networks. In addition to traditional areas of interest, such as climate change, research support, critical resources, and cooperation, new topics such as geopolitics and security have emerged in recent EU policy documents on the Arctic region. Since the emergence of the EU Arctic policy, the EU’s involvement in the Arctic has increased, but its influence is limited by the lack of formal jurisdiction, which is primarily attributed to the fact that the member states of the EU have no access to the Arctic Ocean. The legitimacy of the European Union as an Arctic actor is also questioned. However, the EU’s indirect influence, including its environmental footprint, is significant through environmental, economic, and political ties. Simultaneously, differences have been identified among the positions of the Arctic states that are EU members concerning the European Union’s advancement in Arctic affairs. The formulation of the EU’s renewed Arctic policy in 2021 indicates that geopolitical considerations and climate priorities are likely to shape EU engagement in the Arctic in the coming years. However, a successful strategy will require increasing attention to the controversial political issues between different Arctic actors, whose activity in this region is only increasing.
References
ACCESS (2012). Operational conditions of Arctic indigenous peoples’ effective participation in the future Arctic governance. Available from: https://www.lecerclepolaire.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/ACCESS-D5.61-LCP1.pdf (accessed 12 March 2025).
Arctic Portal (2008). The Ilulisat Declaration. Arctic Ocean Conference Ilulissat, Greenland, 27 – 29 Мay 2008. Available from: https://arcticportal.org/images/stories/pdf/Ilulissat-declaration.pdf (accessed 12 March 2025).
Bryan, J. R. & Millard, P. (2021). Whitney Lackenbauer, Trojan Dragons? Normalizing China’s Presence in the Arctic. Canadian Global Affairs Institute. Available from: https://www.cgai.ca/trojan_dragons_normalizing_chinas_presence_in_the_arctic (accessed 12 March 2025).
CBC (2009). Canada against EU entry to Arctic Council because of seal trade ban. Available from: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/canada-against-eu-entry-to-arctic-council-because-of-seal-trade-ban-1.806188 (accessed 12 March 2025).
European Commission (2008). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council - The European Union and the Arctic region. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HR/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52008DC0763 (accessed 12 March 2025).
European Commission (2016). Joint communication to the European Parliament and the Council. An integrated European Union policy for the Arctic. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52016JC0021 (accessed 12 March 2025).
European Commission (2021a). Overview of EU actions in the Arctic and their impact. Final Report. Available from: https://eprd.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/EU-Policy-Arctic-Impact-Overview-Final-Report.pdf (accessed 12 March 2025).
European Commission (2021b). Questions and answers on the EU's Arctic Strategy. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_21_5164 (accessed 12 March 2025).
European Commission (2021c). Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions. (2021). A Stronger EU Engagement for a Peaceful, Sustainable, and Prosperous Arctic. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021JC0027 (accessed 12 March 2025).
European Parliament (2008). European Parliament resolution of 9 October 2008 on Arctic governance. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0474_EN.html (accessed 11 March 2025).
European Union External Action (2025). The EU in the Arctic. Available from: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eu-arctic_en (accessed 12 March 2025).
Finnish Government (2019). Opening speech by Prime Minister Antti Rinne at the Artictic Circle Assembly 10.10. Available from: https://valtioneuvosto.fi/en/-/opening-speech-by-prime-minister-antti-rinne-at-the-artic-circle-assembly-10-10- (accessed 12 March 2025).
Lebel, J. & Nilsson, A. (2024). EU Engagement in the Arctic: Challenges to Achieving Ambitions in an Area outside Its Jurisdiction. Arctic Review on Law and Politics. Vol. 15, p. 47–71. Available from: https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/6271/9867 (accessed 12 March 2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v15.6271
Mann, M. (2021). Exclusive interview with Michael Mann, EU’s Ambassador at large for the Arctic / Special envoy for Arctic matters. Groupe d'études géopolitiques. Available from: https://geopolitique.eu/en/2021/01/18/exclusive-interview-with-michael-mann-eus-ambassador-at-large-for-the-arctic-special-envoy-for-arctic-matters/ (accessed 12 March 2025).
Melchiorre, T. (2004). The European Union and the Arctic: the Case of Fishery. The Yearbook of Polar Law Online, 15(1), p. 231-257. Available from: https://brill.com/view/journals/yplo/15/1/article-p231_9.xml (accessed 12 March 2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22116427_015010010
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (2011). The Arctic. Available from: https://um.dk/en/foreign-policy/the-arctic (accessed 12 March 2025).
North Sweden European Office (2023). Kiruna in the spotlight during the Swedish EU presidency inauguration. Available from: https://www.northsweden.eu/english/news/2023/kiruna-in-the-spotlight-during-the-swedish-eu-presidency-inauguration/ (accessed 12 March 2025).
Østhagen, A. (2017). Geopolitics and security in the Arctic: what role for the EU? European View. Volume 16, Issue 2, p. 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-017-0459-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-017-0459-1
Phillips L.(2008). Commission backs Norway's Arctic vision: no new treaty. EU Observer. Available from: https://euobserver.com/*/ar8b53d1b8 (accessed 12 March 2025).
Staalesen, А. (2019). Brussels seeks new solid ground in melting Arctic. Arctic Today. Available from: https://www.arctictoday.com/brussels-seeks-new-solid-ground-in-melting-arctic/ (accessed 12 March 2025).
The Arctic Institute (2022). European Union. Available from: https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/country-backgrounders/european-union/ (accessed 12 March 2025).
Wegge, N. (2012). The EU and the Arctic: European foreign policy in the making. Arctic Review on Law and Politics. Vol. 3, № 1, p. 6–29. https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v3.30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v3.30