The Essence and Characteristic Features of Modern Democratic Backsliding

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2025.51.193-199

Keywords:

democracy, democratic backsliding, populism, political regime, democratic institutions, polarization, rule of law, autocracy

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of current trends, causes, and factors of modern democratic backsliding. It has been proven that the main features of democratic regression include the strengthening of the executive branch, restrictions on freedom of speech and assembly, destruction of the system of checks and balances, manipulation of the electoral process, a decline in judicial independence, political populism, a decline in public trust and the systematic violation of human rights. The main scientific approaches and theories that study the mechanisms and patterns of democratic institutional decline are analyzed. Democratic backsliding is defined as a complex of deliberate actions carried out by political leaders to take control of government bodies, limit political competition, maintain power and destroy the fundamental principles of the rule of law and democratic values.  

The role of populism in the process of limiting political competition, reducing the effectiveness of democratic institutions, deteriorating the quality of political decisions, deepening political polarization and social divisions is examined. The characteristic features and mechanisms of democratic backsliding and the dismantling of the principles, values, and norms of liberal democracy in Hungary are considered. It has been established that changes in constitutional norms by political leaders, the expansion of executive powers, unlimited control over state institutions and the electoral process has a direct impact on the violation of democratic procedures and the decline in the quality of public administration. It is proved that a part of society may approve democratic regression in exchange for guarantees of stability, security, support for conservative values, socio-economic well-being and the preservation of power for representatives of the political force with which they associate themselves.

Author Biographies

Volodymyr Kravchenko, Dnipro State Medical Academy

PhD in Political Science, Associate Professor, Department of Language Training and Humanities

Oxana Dobryden, Dnipro State Medical Academy

PhD  in Social Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Language Training and Humanities

References

Abels, C., Huttunen, K., Hertwig, R. and Lewandowsky, S. (2024). Dodging the autocratic bullet: enlisting behavioural science to arrest democratic backsliding. Behavioural Public Policy. pp. 1-28. 10.1017/bpp.2024.43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.43

Bermeo, N. (2016). On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 27 (1). pp. 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012

Bernhard, M. (2021). Democratic Backsliding in Poland and Hungary. Slavic Review. Vol. 80 (3). pp. 585-607. 10.1017/slr.2021.145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/slr.2021.145

Chiru, M. and Wunsch, N. (2021). Democratic backsliding as a catalyst for polity-based contestation? Populist radical right cooperation in the European Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy. Vol 30 (1). pp. 64-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1984546

Cianetti, L. and Hanley, S. (2021). The end of the backsliding paradigm. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 32 (1). pp. 66-80. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2021.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2021.0001

Curato, N. and Fossati, D. (2020). Authoritarian Innovations: Crafting support for a less democratic Southeast Asia. Democratization. Vol. 27 (6). pp. 1006-1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1777985

Diamond, L. (2015). Facing Up to the Democratic Recession. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 26 (1). pp.141-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0009

Diamond, L. (2020). Democratic regression in comparative perspective: scope, methods, and causes. Democratization. Vol. 28 (1). pp. 22-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1807517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1807517

Foa, R. and Mounk, Y. (2016). The Democratic Disconnect. Journal of Democracy. Vol. 27 (3). pp. 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0049

Gerschewski, J. (2020). Erosion or decay? Conceptualizing causes and mechanisms of democratic regression. Democratization. Vol. 28 (1). pp. 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1826935. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1826935

Grillo, E., Luo, Z., Nalepa, M. and Prato, C. (2024). Theories of Democratic Backsliding. Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 27. pp. 381-400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041322-025352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041322-025352

Jee, H., Lueders, H. and Myrick, R. (2021). Towards a unified approach to research on democratic backsliding. Democratization. Vol. 29 (4). pp. 754-767. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.2010709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.2010709

Lührmann, A. and Lindberg, S. (2019). A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it? Democratization. Vol. 26 (7). pp. 1095-1113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029

Luo, Z. and Przeworski, A. (2019). Democracy and Its Vulnerabilities: Dynamics of Backsliding. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4yw98 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4yw98

Matlosa, K. (2023). Global trends and impact of democratic recession: Hard choices for the Global South. South African Journal of International Affairs. Vol. 30 (3). pp. 337-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2023.2269149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2023.2269149

Mechkova, V., Lührmann, A. and Lindberg, S. (2017). How Much Democratic Backsliding? Journal of Democracy. Vol. 28 (4). pp. 162-169. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0075

Waldner, D. and Lust, E. (2018). Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. Vol. 21. рр. 93-113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628

Wunsch, N. and Gessler, T. (2023). Who tolerates democratic backsliding? A mosaic approach to voters’ responses to authoritarian leadership in Hungary. Democratization. Vol. 30 (5). pp. 914-937. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2203918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2203918

Published

30-06-2025

How to Cite

Kravchenko, V., & Dobryden, O. (2025). The Essence and Characteristic Features of Modern Democratic Backsliding. Modern Historical and Political Issues, (51), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2025.51.193-199