“Traditional Values”: Russia’s Tool of Domestic and Foreign Political Influence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2023.47.142-152Keywords:
values, traditional values, Russia, “Russian world”Abstract
Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which started in February 2022, has given rise to a number of attempts at explaining what is behind Moscow’s ideological and political grounds therefor. It can be argued that one such component, often overlooked, lies in Russia’s seemingly unique concept of “traditional values”, one that has been cultivated throughout decades of its recent history. The roots of “traditional values” might be traced back to Eurasianism and neo-Eurasianism, a school of geopolitical thought propounded, recently, by Russian ideologist Aleksandr Dugin, and the “Russian world”, an abstract amalgama of Orthodox Christian and linguistic features designed to become an all-encompassing formula for extending Russia’s geopolitical reach. Consequently, starting from mid-2000s, “traditional values” have been used by Russia as a means of presenting an alternative to the more dominant Western paradigm of global politics and way of life, externally, and as an internal political ideological tool based upon countering “destructive Western influences”, internally. A new impetus has been given to “traditional values” since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the concept being codified in several legal texts defining Russia’s foreign and national cultural policies. Due to being abstract and at the same time based upon a number of recognisable ideas, such as Orthodox Christianism or unacceptance of LGBT+, “traditional values” have found its way as an important tool of Russia’s foreign and domestic political influence. Its importance is even more highlighted by the fact that divergence of values is at the core of Ukraine-Russia years-long confrontation, the former clearly defining itself as part of a common Europe and Euro-Atlantic security domain. In this context, “traditional values” are often proposed as an alternative to “European values”, (wrongly) associated with ignorance of national cultures and “destruction” of traditional family; and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, therefore, can be looked upon as a “clash of values” as well.
References
Dezhnev, V., Novykova, O. (2015), “Tradytsyonnыe tsennosty: k opredelenyiu poniatyia”, Vestnyk Shadrynskoho hosudarstvennoho pedahohycheskoho unyversyteta, 4 (28), s. 71-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1941-9635.2015.tb01427.x
Ievropeiskyi Parlament (2022), “Viina Rosii proty Ukrainy: vykorystannia Kremlem relihii yak instrumentu zovnishnoi polityky”. Available from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ ATAG/2022/729430/EPRS_ATA(2022)729430_XL.pdf [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Zyhar, M. (2016), Vsia kriemlievskaia rat. Kratkaia istoriia sovriemiennoi Rossii, Moskva: Intielliektualnaia litieratura, 408 s.
Ilin, I. (1928), “O russkomъ fashizmie”, Russkii kolokol, 3, c. 54-64. Available from https://vtoraya-literatura.com/pdf/russky_kolokol_1928_3_text.pdf [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Ilin, I. (1933), “Natsional-sotsializm. Novyi dukh”. Available from http://www.odinblago.ru/filosofiya/ilin/ilin_i_nacional_sociali [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Ilin, I. (1950), “Chto sulit miru raschlienieniie Rossii?”. Available from http://www.pravoslavie.ru/2444.html [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Mieduza (2023), “Kak «traditsionnyie tsiennosti» stali opravdaniiem dlia riepriessii, a potom i voiny”, 3 yanvaria. Available from https://meduza.io/feature/2023/01/03/kak-traditsionnye-tsennosti-stali-opravdaniem-dlya-repressiy-a-potom-i-voyny [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Morozov, A. (2022), “Pravoslaviie v borbie za traditsionnyie tsiennosti”, Nauchnyi viestnik Omskoi akadiemii MVD Rossii, 4 (87), s. 360-364.
Panchienko, Zh. (2016), “Hieopolitichieskaia kontsieptsiia «Ievraziistvo» kak faktor vliianiia na biezopasnost v Vostochnoi Yevropie”, Wschód Europy, Vol. 2, pp. 57-74.
Patriarkhiia.ru (2022), “Patriarshaia propovied v Niedieliu syropustnuiu poslie Liturhii v Khramie Khrista Spasitielia”, 6 marta. Available from http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/ 5906442.html [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Ponomariev, P. (2012), “Vliianiie hlobalizatsii na izmienieniie roli hosudarstva (politiko-aksiolohichieskii analiz)”, Viestnik Moskovskoho univiersitieta. Sieriia 12. Politichieskiie nauki, 3, 2012, s. 115-119.
Rasulov, V. (2022), “Traditsionnyie tsiennosti nie vydierzhali kritiki”, Kommiersant, 15 fievralia. Available from https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5217042 [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Rudakov, A., Mironov, A. (2018), “Tsiennosti, traditsii i idientichnost kak kontsieptualnyie osnovy politiki Rossii”, Viestnik MHOU. Sieriia: Istoriia i politichieskiie nauki, 4, s. 293-302.
Sait priezidienta Rossii (2012), “Poslaniie Priezidienta Fiedieralnomu Sobraniiu”, 12 diekabria. Available from http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/17118 [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Sait priezidienta Rossii (2023), “Poslaniie Priezidienta Fiedieralnomu Sobraniiu”, 21 fievralia. Available from http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/70565 [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Sait priezidienta Rossii (no date), “Ukaz Priezidienta Rossiiskoi Fiedieratsii ot 02.07.2021 h. № 400 «O Stratiehii natsionalnoi biezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Fiedieratsii»”. Available from http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/47046 [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Sait priezidienta Rossii (no date), “Ukaz Priezidienta Rossiiskoi Fiedieratsii ot 09.11.2022 h. № 809 «Ob utvierzhdienii Osnov hosudarstviennoi politiki po sokhranieniiu i ukrieplieniiu traditsionnykh rossiiskikh dukhovno-nravstviennykh tsiennostiei»”. Available from http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/48502 [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Topalova, S. (2014), “Russkyi myr” yak systemnyi politychnyi mif suchasnoi Rosii, Visnyk KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia «Pytannia politolohii», 1132. Available from https://periodicals.karazin.ua/politology/article/view/1362/1119 [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Cherenkov, M. (2019), “Tradytsiini tsinnosti yak postsekuliarnyi konstrukt u postradianskomu konteksti: «skrepы» «russkoho myra» proty ukrainskoi «revoliutsii tsinnostei»”, Ukraina moderna, 26, s. 180-192. Available from http://publications.lnu.edu.ua/journals/index.php/ uamoderna/article/view/1107 [Accessed 11 March 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30970/uam.2019.26.1107
Shchiedrovitskii, P. (2000), “Russkii mir. Vozmozhnyie tsieli samoopriedielieniia”, Russkii Arkhipielah. Available from https://archipelag.ru/authors/shedrovicky_petr/?library=2015 [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Eliektronnyi fond pravovykh i normativno-tiekhnichieskikh dokumientov (no date), “Ukaz Priezidienta Rossiiskoi Fiedieratsii «O Stratiehii hosudarstviennoi natsionalnoi politiki Rossiiskoi Fiedieratsii na pieriod do 2025 hoda» (s izmienieniiami na 6 diekabria 2018 hoda)”. Available from https://docs.cntd.ru/document/902387360 [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Iakubova, L. (2022), “Ivan Ilin. Patriarkh rosiiskoho fashyzmu”, Ukrainskyi tyzhden, 19 July. Available from https://tyzhden.ua/ivan-ilin-patriarkh-rosijskoho-fashyzmu/ [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Iarmolenko, O. (2022), “putin chasto tsytuie filosofa Ilina ta henerala Denikina. Obydva zaperechuvaly nezalezhnist Ukrainy i vystupaly za dyktatorske pravlinnia. Os yak vony maizhe stolittia tomu opysuvaly suchasnu rosiiu”, Babel, 6 April. Available from https://babel.ua/texts/77596-putin-chasto-cituye-filosofa-iljina-ta-generala-denikina-obidva-zaperechuvali-nezalezhnist-ukrajini-i-vistupali-za-diktatorske-pravlinnya-os-yak-voni-mayzhe-stolittya-tomu-opisuvali-suchasnu-rosiyu [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Beattie, P. (2019), ‘Ideology, Values, and Foreign Policy’, Oxford Bibliographies, 24 April. Available from https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199743292/obo-9780 199743292-0262.xml [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Feklyunina, V. (2016), Soft power and identity: Russia, Ukraine and the ‘Russian world(s)’, European Journal of International Relations, 22(4), pp. 773-796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066115601200
Nye, J. S. (2004), Soft Power: The Means To Sucess In World Politics, New York: PublicAffairs, 191 p.
OHCHR (no date), ‘Promoting human rights and fundamental freedoms through a better understanding of traditional values of humankind’. Available from https://www.ohchr.org/ru/hr-bodies/hrc/advisory-committee/traditionalvalues [Accessed 11 March 2023].
Reid, G. (2013), ‘The Trouble With Tradition: When "Values" Trample Over Rights’, Human Rights Watch. Available from https://www.hrw.org/node/259925 [Accessed 11 March 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447309925.003
Srinivasan, K., Mayall, J., Pulipaka, S. (Eds.), Values in Foreign Policy: Investigating Ideals and Interests (2019), London: Rowman & Littlefield International, 293 p.
Tsygankov, A. (2019), Russia's Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity, 5th ed., Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 336 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Oleh Pavliuk

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.