Modern Theoretical and Conceptual Approaches to the Study of Soft Power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2024.49.98-111Keywords:
soft power, conceptualization, hard power, attractiveness, attraction, public diplomacy, operationalization, actor-centered approachAbstract
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in studying soft power, as the concept has become increasingly relevant in the international arena. This paper provides a comparative analysis of modern theoretical and conceptual approaches to the study of soft power. Despite its popularity, which grew due to the interconnectedness of states in a globalized world, nevertheless, conceptual and theoretical improvement, as well as the criticism of the concept of soft power, require a new comprehensive analysis of “soft power” in the theory of international relations. Drawing on a range of literature from political science, international relations, and sociology, the paper examines key theoretical frameworks and conceptual definitions of soft power. Overall, the paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of the field and offers insights into the challenges and opportunities facing scholars and practitioners studying soft power. Thus, the article examines the problematic nature of the concept of “attractiveness” as a central term in the understanding of soft power. It is the insufficient conceptual development of this concept in the field of international relations that is the reason for the slow development of the concept. In addition, the article presents the main approaches to the operationalization of the concept and proposes additions to it. Special attention is paid to understanding soft power through the prism of liberal, realistic and constructivist approaches. In addition, the features of the actor-centered approach in the study of specific cases of the use of soft power are analyzed. The last aspect presented in the article is the relationship between soft and hard power. It has been proven that soft power can have the characteristics and effects of hard power, and cases where hard power is used can have a soft effect on other actors.
References
Kapitonenko M.H. (2010). “Miaka syla” u suchasnii svitovii politytsi: teoretychni aspekty. Aktualni problemy mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn. Vyp. 94 (Chastyna II), s. 20-29.
Tkach.O.I. (2018). “Miaka syla” yak kharakterna oznaka politychnoho vplyvu velykoi derzhavy za umov bahatopoliarnoho svitu v Latynoamerykanskomu rehioni. Politologe Bulletin, Iss. 80, s. 77- 85.
Yaremko Z.M., Tkach H.V. (2016). Shchodo natsionalnoho brendynhu v Ukraini v konteksti prosuvannia yii interesiv u sviti. Molodyi vchenyi, No. 12.1 (40), s.1035-1040.
Aron A., Lewandowski G. (2001). Psychology of Interpersonal Attraction. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/interpersonal-attraction (Last accessed: 05.02.2024).
Bilgin P., Elis B. (2008). Hard Power. Soft Power: Toward a More Realistic Power Analysis. Insight Turkey, Vol. 10, No 2, pp. 5-20.
Dahl R. A. (1957). The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 201-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830020303
Dutta A. (2018). The Concept of Soft Power: A Critical Analysis. International Affairs Forum. Available at: https://www.ia-forum.org/Content/ViewInternal_Document.cfm?contenttype_id=5&ContentID=8393 (Last accessed: 16.03.2024).
Ferguson N. (2009). Think Again: Power. Foreign Policy. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/11/03/ think-again-power/ (Last accessed: 21.02.2024).
Gallarotti M.G. (2011). Soft Power: What it is, why it’s important, and the conditions for its effective use. Journal of Political Power, pp. 2-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2011.557886
Gray S. Colin. (2011). Hard Power and Soft Power: The Utility of Military Force as an Instrument of Policy in the 21st Century. Strategic Studies Institute, 581 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA542526
Hall T. (2010). An unclear Attraction: A Critical Examination of Soft Power as an Analytical Category. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol.3, pp. 189-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poq005
Kearn D. (2011). The Hard Truths about Soft Power. Joutnal of Political Power, April 2011, pp. 65-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2011.556869
Kelley H., Bersheid E., Christensen E. (1983). Close Relationships. New York: W. H. Freeman, 612 p.
MacDonald S., Singh J.P. (2017). Soft Power Today Measuring the Influences and Effects. The Institute for International Cultural Relations. British Council, 96 p.
Martino D. M (2020). Soft Power: theoretical framework and political foundations. Przegląd Europejski, Vol. 2020, No.4, pp. 11-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/1641-2478pe.4.20.1
Mattern J. B. (2005). Why “Soft Power” Isn’t So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, Vol.33, No. 3, pp. 583-612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330031601
Matsuda T. (2007). Soft Power and its perils: US Cultural Policy in Early Postwar Japan and Permanent Dependency. Chicago:Stanford University Press, 80 p.
McClory J. (2022). The soft power of Ukraine's blue and gold offers hope for victory. Nikkei Asia. Available at: https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/The-soft-power-of-Ukraine-s-blue-and-gold-offers-hope-for-victory (Last accessed: 15.02.2024).
Mingjang L. (2009). Soft Power: China's Emerging Strategy in Internaional Politics. UK: Lexington Books, 275 p.
Morgenthau H.J. (1949). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knoff, 528 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2086875
Nye J.S. (2022). Soft Power After Ukraine. Project Syndicate. Available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/soft-power-after-russia-war-in-ukraine-by-joseph-s-nye-2022-05 (Last accessed: 02.02.2024).
Nye J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2004, 206 p.
Nye J.S. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The Annals of the American Academy, March 2008, pp. 94-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699
Ohnesorge H. W. (2020). Soft Power: The Forces of Attraction in International Relations. Bonn: Springer, 307 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29922-4
Patalakh A. (2016). Assessment of Soft Power Strategies: Towards an Aggregative Analytical Model for Country-Focused Case Srudy Research. CIRR XXII (76), pp. 85-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2016-0007
Patalakh A. (2018). Soft Power Revisited: What Attraction Is in International Relations. PhD thesis, University of Milanom 2016/2017, 231 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3381542
Tabor A., Jenne E. (N.D.). Stretching the «Soft Power» Concept from Washington to Beijing. Manuscript. Available at: http://www.siwps.org/wp-content/uploads/Jenne-and-Tabor-Stretching-the-Soft-Power-Concept-from-Washington-to-Beijing.pdf (Last accessed: 15.02.2024).
Tyler M.C., Abbasov A., Gibson N, Teo F. (2012). Domestic Public Diplomacy. Discussion Paper: International Experience, April 2012. Australian Institute of International Affairs, 15 p.
Vyas U. (2010). Soft Power in Japan-China Relations: State, Sub-state and Nonstate Relations. London: Routledge, pp. 71-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203835791
Winkler S. Ch. (2009). «Soft Power is such a benign animal»: narrative power and the reification of concepts in Japan. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 32, No.4, pp. 483-501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1623171
Yukaruc U. (2017). A Critical Approach to Soft Power. Journal of Bitlis Eren University, Vol.6, No.2, December, pp. 491-502.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Svitlana Konstantynyuk

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.