Ukraine in International Relations of the Post-Westphalian Era: Changing Geostrategic Role

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2022.46.51-61

Keywords:

The Post-Westphalian era, Ukraine, Russian-Ukrainian war, Ukrainian-Polish relations, USA, EU, region of Central and Eastern Europe, geopolitical splits, post-war scenarios, Nassim Taleb, international system

Abstract

The article examines the international challenges of the Post-Westphalia era and emphasizes that each individual country strives to avoid a marginal and peripheral state, and therefore Ukraine as a sovereign state should intensively engage in globalization and integration processes. It can be stated that one of the consequences of the Russian-Ukrainian war will be the decline of the power and influence of the Kremlin's neo-empire and the gradual formation of Ukraine as a new power center between the Baltic and the Black Sea. One of the main results of the first victories of the Ukrainian army was that Putin failed to make Ukraine a «footnote» of world history (as it once happened with East Germany). The author proves the thesis that in the next 10-15 years, we should develop a flexible Ukrainian-centric asymmetric geostrategy for the region of Central-Eastern Europe, especially in the military-political sense. In the sense of democratic development, Ukraine should become an effective subject of international relations, an attractor capable of uniting around itself as a magnet – economically, socially and politically all interested neighbors from the Baltic to the Black Sea. Author concluded, in the new geopolitical conditions, the hierarchy of relations imposed by Putinʼs Russia on the expanses of Eurasia is collapsing and creating а «multipolar» Eurasian system with several centers of influence. Сonsequently, China will increasingly influence Kazakhstan and Central Asia in general, Turkey will strengthen in the Caucasus, and from the Baltic to the Black Sea, Ukraine, acting in close alliance with Poland, will take a responsible and leading position. Ukraine is waging a complex, very tiring asymmetric war with the Russian Federation, which, however, is able to strengthen our country not only from the point of view of security and defense, but also as a model of stable and successful democracy in Eastern Europe, which protects not only the borders, but also the fundamental values of the European Union. The conclusion is made that transitional period associated with the crisis of the Westphalian system is far from over and it requires serious efforts from official Kyiv, primarily in terms of diplomatic and military-political preparations for the medium-term perspective before joining the EU and NATO.

Author Biography

Volodymyr Fisanov , Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

Doctor of History, Professor of the Department of International Relations and Public Communications

References

“Armiya zrobyla Ukrayinu subʼyektom heopolityky”. (2022), Timoti Snayder pro znachennya oporu shyrokomasshtabniy ahresiyi Rosiyi. available at: https://www. radiosvoboda.org/a/snayder-armiya-vidsich-rosiyi-ukrayina-subyekt/31885780. html (accessed: 14.09.2022).

Bzhezinsʼkyy Z. (2012), Stratehichne bachennya: Ameryka i kryza hlobalʹnoyi vlady, Litopys, Lʹviv, 168 s.

“Yezhy Hedroytsʼ ta ukrayinsʹka emihratsiya”. (2008), Lystuvannya 1950-982 rokiv, Krytyka, Kyyiv, 752 s.

Konyechna-Salamatin Y., Otrishchenko N., Stryyek T. ( 2018), Zvit pro doslidzhennya pro pamʺyatʹ suchasnykh polyakiv ta ukrayintsiv, Varshava, Collegium Civitas, available at: https://www.lvivcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/ History-people-events -ua.pdf (accessed :17.09.2022).

Kremenʼ T. V. (2004), Transformatsiya derzhavnoho suverenitetu v umovakh hlobalizatsiyi: avtoreferat dys. kand. nauk: 23.00.04., available at: http://www .disslib.org/transformatsia-derzha vnoho-suverenitetu-v-umovakh-hlobalizatsiyi .html (accessed: 19.09.2022).

Mikhnik A., o. Tishner YU., Zhakovsʼkyy YA. (2013), Rozmovy mizh panom i panottsem, “Dukh i litera”, Kyyiv. 624 s.

Mykhalʼchenko N., Andrushchenko V. (2012), Ukrayna razdelennaya v sebe: ot Leonydyy k Vyktoryy,T. I., YPyÉNY ymeny Y. F. Kurasa NAN Ukrayny, Kyev, 584 s.

Parokhonsʼkyy B., Yavorsʼka H. (2019), Ontolohiya viyny i myru: bezpeka, stratehiya, smysl, Natsionalʹnyy instytut stratehichnykh doslidzhenʼ, Kyyiv, 560 s.

Puhach V.H. (2019), “Upravlinsʼkyy stylʹ postvestfalʹsʹkoyi derzhavy”, Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V.I. Vernadsʼkoho. Seriya: Derzhavne upravlinnya, available at: http://www.pubadm. Vernadsky journals.in.ua /journals /2019/5_2019/5.pdf (accessed: 18.09.2022).

Taleb N. N. (2022), Antykrykhkistʹ. Pro (ne)vrazlyve u realʹnomu zhytti, Nash format, Kyyiv, 400 s.

Troyan I. (2011), “Transformatsiya derzhavnoho suverenitetu v umovakh hlobalizatsiyi”, Ukrayinsʼka natsionalʼna ideya: realiyi ta perspektyvy rozvytku, vypusk 23, available at: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/ handle /123456 789/25788/28-Troyan.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed: 17.09.2022).

Fisanov V. (2010), “Oblychchyam do Yevropy (do 60-richchya Deklaratsiyi Shumana)”, Forum. Suspilʼno-politychnyy zhurnal, №1(8). S. 8-13.

Shevelʼov YU. (1948), “Chetvertyy Kharkiv”, Z istoriyi nezakinchenoyi viyny, Vydavnychyy dim “Kyyivo-Mohylyansʹka akademiya”, 2009, Kyyiv. S. 159-176.

Almunia J. (2022), “Marking the first Europe Day of the Brave New World”, 9 May, available at: https://www.ceps.eu/marking-the-first-europe-day-of-the-brave-new-world/ (accessed: 21.09.2022).

“A Strategic Compass for Security and Defence”. (2022), Council of the European Union, Brussels. 21 March. available at: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc /document/ST-7371-2022-INIT/en/pdf (accessed: 21.08. 2022).

Bendyk E., Buras Р. (2022), “Polska wobec wojny, Polska w świecie po wojnie Zadania na nowy czas”. available at: https://www.batory.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022 /04/E.Bendyk. P.Buras_ Polska.wobec_.wojny _.Polska.w. swiecie .po_.wojnie.pdf (accessed: 11.09.2022).

Brooks D. (2022), “How Do You Handle a Wounded Putin?”, Sept. 23, 2022, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/23/opinion/wounded-putin.html (accessed: 01.10.2022).

Buzan B., Little, R. (1999), “Beyond Westphalia? Capitalism after the ‘Fall’”, Review of International Studies, 25, Special Issue, p. 89—104, available at: https://library.fes.de/ libalt/journals/swetsfulltext/14965937.pdf (accessed: 19.09.20 22). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210599000893

Dragone G. C., Jones S.G. (2022), “The Future of Italy’s Armed Forces”, Online Event, Center for Strategic and International Studies, May 11, available at: https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/event/220511_Italy_ Arm ed_ Forces. pdf?rPzzZMffz8z5AxzyI3uTphaCtBcCy1xv (accessed: 15.09. 2022).

Editorial (2022), Politique étrangère, № 2, available at: https://www.ifri.org/sites /default /files / atoms / files /pe2_2022_editorial.pdf (accessed: 11.06.2022).

Gawin D. (2016), “Polityka historyczna”, available at: https:// teologiapolityczna.pl/dariusz-gawin -polityka-historyczna-tpct-5- (accessed: 15.09. 2022).

Makar J. (2016), “Współczesne stosunki ukraińsko-polskie w kontekście procesów integracji europejskiej”, Wschód Europy, vol. 2, № 2, available at: https://journals.umcs.pl/ we/ article /view/5585/3835 (accessed: 15.09.2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/we.2016.2.2.169

Rogers J. (2022), “A new European triumvirate: Plurilateralism in action”, 2 February, available at: https://www.geostrategy.org.uk/britains-world/a-new-european-triumvirate-plurila teralism-in-action/ (accessed: 3.10.2022).

Tocci N. (2022), Putin vs Monnet: European Resilience, Energy and the Ukraine War. IAI Papers 22, Istituto Affari Internationali, Sept. 25, available at: https://www.iai.it/sites/default /files /iaip 2225.pdf (accessed: 7.10.2022).

Published

22-12-2022

How to Cite

Fisanov , V. (2022). Ukraine in International Relations of the Post-Westphalian Era: Changing Geostrategic Role. Modern Historical and Political Issues, (46), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2022.46.51-61