The Peculiarities of the International subjectivity of the European Union: A Place in the Postbipolar Order

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2022.46.62-68

Keywords:

European Union, liberal values, subjectivity of the union

Abstract

This article is an attempt to research peculiarities of the international subjectivity of the EU in the postbipolar world order. It is proved that despite the crisis phenomena, modern challenges and threats, the European Union will continue exist as a subject of international relations. According to the theoretical approach of international cooperation, we could observe the effect of Lindbergh's “chain reaction”, when cooperation in one or another area (economic as in ECSC, cultural, social) leads to interaction in others. These circumstances led to necessity to create special supranational institutions that coordinate further integration. Success of the EU has proved the theoretical validity of the main postulates of functionalism and neofunctionalism. The political essence of the European Union today is derived from common values (philosophy of liberalism) and utilitarian interests. Common liberal values that create the possibility of the consolidation of states and became a cornerstone in the foundation of the subject and pragmatic mutually beneficial relations. These smart combination of two main aspects exist and work for more than 70 years in European Union. Other important conclusion is that in the circumstances, when the world returns to the power game of the great powers the EU is unable to compete with the “great powers” in terms of military power and political influence. Leveling the absence of this component is currently impossible by economic or political powers. Nevertheless, the potential of the union remains predictively large. Further integration and strengthening of the subjectivity of the EU is possible in case of creation its own armed forces, further cooperation within the framework of PESCO and the immanent awareness of the need to respond to external threats together. These actions will increase the defense capability of the EU and give more power to political union as a decision-making center.

Author Biography

Oleksandr Voronetskyi, National University of Ostroh Academy

Postgraduate student of the Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations and National Security

References

Bergmann M. (2020) “Europe’s Geopolitical Awakening. The Pandemic Rouses a Sleeping Giant”, Foreign Affairs. Vol 99, No, 4, pp. 47-58.

Bergmann M., Haddad B. (2021) “Europe Needs to Step Up on Defense. Brussels Should Borrow and Spend More on Security”, Foreign Affairs. Available from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ articles/europe/2021-11-18/europe-needs-step-defense [Accessed 10 August 2022].

Biscop S. (2018) “Letting Europe Go Its Own Way. The Case for Strategic Autonomy”, Foreign Affairs. Available from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-07-06/letting-europe-go-its-own-way [Accessed 10 August 2022].

Braillard Ph. and Djalili M.R. (1988) Les relations internationales. Université de Montréal Vol. 30. No. 4: pp 364-365.

CFSP (2018) CFSP establishing the list of projects to be developed under PESCO 340. Brussels: EUR-Lex. Available from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2018/340/oj/eng [Accessed 10 August 2022].

Council of the European Union (2020) Council Conclusions on the PESCO Strategic Review 2020 No. 13188/20. Brussels: European Council. Available from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ en/press/press-releases/2020/11/20/defence-cooperation-council-approves-conclusions-on-the-pesco-strategic-review-2020/ [ Accessed 10 August 2022].

Council of the European Union (2022), Timeline - EU restrictive measures against Russia over Ukraine, Brussels.. Available from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions/restrictive-measures-against-russia-over-ukraine/sanctions-against-russia-explained/ [Accessed 20 October 2022].

Deutsch K.W., Burrell S.A., Kann R.A., Lee M. (1957) Political Community and North Atlantic Area. Princeton University Press.

Duchêne F. (1973), “The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence”, In: Kohnstammand M., Hager H.W A Nation Writ Large? London: Macmillan Press, pp. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-01826-0_1

FitchRatings (2022), FitchRatings website. Available from https://www.fitchratings.com/ entity/european-union-80442252 [Accessed 12 August 2022].

Hinshaw. D., Ojewska N (2022) WSJ. [online] The Wall Street Journal. Available from https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/russia-ukraine-latest-news-2022-04-29/card/poland-has-sent-more-than-200-tanks-to-ukraine-Krwar3DCPzHJJk4UMVh4 [Accessed 10 August 2022].

Howorth J. (2010) “The EU as a Global Actor: Grand Strategy for a Global Grand Bargain?”, Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 48. No. 3: 455-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02060.x

Leonard M. (2022) “The Real End of Pax Americana Germany and Japan Are Changing—and So Is the Postwar Order”, Foreign Affairs. Available from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ articles/japan/2022-06-13/real-end-pax-americana [Accessed 10 August 2022].

Lindbergh N.L. (1963) The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. Stanford Univ.Pr. pp 127-129.

Maull H. (2005), “Europe and the New Balance of Global Order”, International Affairs, Vol. 81. No 4: pp. 779-780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00484.x

Morgenthau H. (1962) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Peace and Power. Alfred Knopf.

Nye J. (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, Public Affairs Books.

Reid A. (2022) “Putin’s War on History. The Thousand-Year Struggle Over Ukraine”, Foreign Affairs, Vol 101 No.2, pp 54-63.

SIPRI (2021) Military Expenditure Database expenses in US$ 1988-2020, p. 17-19.

Sjursen H. (2004), “Changes to European Security in a Communicative Perspective”. Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 121-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836704042864

The Federal Government (2022), Military support for Ukraine. Available from: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/news/military-support-ukraine-2054992 [Accessed 20 October 2022].

Toje A. (2010) “The European Union as a Small Power”, Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 49. No. 1, pp. 25-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02128.x

Tonra B. (2009) SSRN. [online] University College Dublin. Available from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1484740 [Accessed 10 August 2022].

Xuetong Y. (2021), “Becoming Strong. The New Chinese Foreign Policy”, Foreign Affairs, Vol 100 No. 2, pp. 27-34.

Published

22-12-2022

How to Cite

Voronetskyi, O. (2022). The Peculiarities of the International subjectivity of the European Union: A Place in the Postbipolar Order. Modern Historical and Political Issues, (46), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2022.46.62-68