The New Silk Road Project as a Fuse for Separatism in the Xinjiang-Uyghur Autonomous Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2019.40.42-49Abstract
This article is about Chinese politics in Xinjiang-Uyghur Autonomous Region in the context of implementation of the “New Silk Road” strategy. Focus on stress factors that exist between the Uyghurs and Chinese government. The caused and motivation of Uyghur separatism are analyzed. Uyghur separatism express itself in different ways: terrorist attacks or international activity, contacts with Islamic organization or relations with Uyghur diasporas of the world. Although there is no new information about ethnic or religious confrontation, but the situation in XUAR does not disappear from the field of view of Beijing. Interest in supporting security in this region has only increased. Particular attention is paid to the “New Silk Road” which will pass through in Xinjiang-Uyghur Autonomous Region. Natural resources and geographic location of this region provide opportunities for economic improvement in western areas of China. XUAR used to be a raw material base, but after start of the project “New Silk Road” new enterprises began to open, infrastructure is actively developing, foreign investment is being attracted. All this changed perception of XUAR from the border land to important section of the “New Silk Road”. The new Chinese concept also reduces the relevance of the Uyghur issue in international relations. Neighboring countries interested in joining to the “New Silk Road” and Chinese investment. Because of this these countries are not so active in the Uyghur issue, which the Uyghur diasporas are trying to support. It should also be noted increased pressure on terrorist organization. Thatʼs why their connection with the East Turkestan Islamic movement has weakened.
Keywords: China, “New Silk Road”, Xinjiang-Uyghur Autonomous Region, XUAR, Uyghur, separatism.
References
2. Ananina, D. (2018), «Mezhetnicheskiy konflikt na territorii Sintszyan-Uygurskogo avtonom-nogo rayona», Gumanitarnyy vektor, № 3, s. 6-11.
3. Anina, D. (2017), «Vsemirnyy Uygurskiy Kongress i politika Pekina v otnoshenii SUAR», Vestnik Zabaykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, № 5, s. 60-66.
4. Bazhenova, Ye. (2017), «Sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe razvitie Sintszyana – forposta zapadnykh rayonov KNR», Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v Kitae, №. 22, s. 457-470.
5. Bazhenova, Ye. (2016), «Sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe razvitie Sintszyana – klyuchevogo punkta na Velikom shelkovom puti», V: Petrovskiy, V. Ye. Novyy shelkovyy put i ego znachenie dlya Rossii, DeLi plyus, s. 147-168.
6. Bibikova, O. (2018), «Uygurskiy dzhikhad v Kitae i Sirii», Rossiya i musulmanskiy mir, № 4, s. 67-77.
7. Buyarov, D. (2015), «Nekotorye aspekty gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya religioznoy sfery v Sintszyan-Uygurskom avtonomnom rayone», Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya, № 18, s. 228-230.
8. Vystup holovy KNR Si Tszinpina v Nazarbaiev universyteti, [online]: http://kz.china-embassy.org/rus/zhgx/t1077192.htm (data zvernennia 05.09.2019).
9. Zhelobov, D. (2014), «Uygurskiy separatizm i “Piramida Maslou”», Rossiya i musulmanskiy mir, № 12, s. 137-141.
10. Zamaraeva, N. (2018), «Kitaysko-pakistanskiy ekonomicheskiy koridor: itogi i vyzovy 2017 – 2018 gg.», V: Safronova Ye. I. Kitay v mirovoy i regionalnoy politike. Istoriya i sovremennost, IDV RAN, № 23, s. 289-306.
11. Konstytutsiia KNR, URL: https://chinalaw.center/constitutional_law/china_constitution_
revised_2018_russian/ (data zvernennia 08.09.2019).
12. Larin, A. (2016), «“Ekonomicheskiy poyas shelkovogo puti”: ekonomicheskoe soderzhanie, struktura, ideologiya», v: Petrovskiy, V. Ye. Novyy shelkovyy put i ego znachenie dlya Rossii, DeLi plyus, s. 38-57.
13. Larin, A. (2016), «Sopryazhenie YeAES i Novogo shelkovogo puti: shansy i vyzovy dlya Rossii», V: Petrovskiy, V. Ye. Novyy shelkovyy put i ego znachenie dlya Rossii, DeLi plyus, s. 109-130.
14. Novichkov, V. (2016), «K voprosu o prichinakh vspleska uygurskogo natsionalizma i separatizma v SUAR KNR v kontse XX-nachale XXI v.», Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, №. 412, s. 98-102.
15. Safronova, Ye. (2018), «XIX sezd KPK, proekt OPOP i otnosheniya Kitaya s razvivayushchimsya mirom», V: Safronova Ye. I. Kitay v mirovoy i regionalnoy politike. Istoriya i sovremennost, IDV RAN, № 23, s. 154-170.
16. Smagulov, A. (2016), «Perspektivy razvitiya sukhogo porta SEZ «Khorgos-Vostochnye vorota» v ramkakh rasshireniya mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva», Problemy nauki, № 4, s. 35-37.
17. Chinaʼs Sinopec gets approval for $20 billion coal-to-gas pipeline. Reuters. URL: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-coal-gas-pipeline/chinas-sinopec-gets-approval-for-20-bill
18. Deadly China blast at Xinjiang railway station. BBC. URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-27225308 (data zvernennia 10.09.2019).
19. Dhaka, A. (2013), “Factoring Central Asia into Chinaʼs Afghanistan policy”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 97-106.
20. Jun Mai (2019) China says it may eventually phase out ʼvocational training centresʼ in Xinjiang where 1 million Uygur Muslims are reportedly held for ʼre-education. SCMP. URL: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3001415/china-says-it-will-eventually-phase-out-vocational-training (data zvernennia 13.09.2019).
21. National Development and Reform Commission (2015) Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road. URL: http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/201503/t20150330_669367.html (data zvernennia11.09.2019).
22. Wong-Tworek, S. (2015), “Chinaʼs economic development plan in Xinjiang and how it effects ethnic instability”, Calhoun. Thesis, 93 p.
23. Zimmerman, T. (2015), “The New Silk Roads: China, the U.S., and the Future of Central Asia”, Center on international cooperation. New York University, 21 p.
