Subregional Projects in the Context of the Development of the EU Eastern Partnership

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2019.40.76-82

Abstract

The author analyzes subregional projects that could add dynamics to the process of European integration in the situation of substantial conceptual and institutional crisis of the European Union what directly affects the efficience of implementation of the EU projects (Eastern Partnership). Here the aurhor means reload and activation of the Organization for Democracy and Economic Development GUAM and conceptualization the Baltic-Black See Union as isntitutional instruments of sub-regional stability in the context of deep crisis of Euroipean security. The consequences of sub-regional instutitutionalization for the EU and its prograns will be complex and multi-dimention. Firstly, there will be the rise of stability and security on the EU eastern flank as a compensation for its non-sufficient security elements as well as NATO low readiness for Russian threat. As soon as activation of Russian neo-imperial revisionism seriously undermines the EU Eastern Partnership Program and hampers the integration of the post-soviet states into the European and Euro-Atlantic in stitutions, establishment of both above-mentioned institutions will give a serious integration impuls for the European civilization and acceleration of the appearance of new wave of the EU members. The other result of institution building will be development of transport and logistic infastructure in the context of the implementationa bilateral EU-China trans continental projects resulting the growth of the EU poterntial as a leading global economic and political player. It is proved that ODED-GUAM and the Baltic-Black Sea Union could become substantial factors of the support of the European Union in whole and its Eastern Partnership Program particularly in case substantial work is being made by the interested states. But the main precondition of the activation pf sub-regional projects is political will and startegic interests of western elites.

Keywords: European Union, EU Eastern Partnership, Organization for Democracy and Economic Development GUAM, Baltic-Black Sea Union, subregional integration.

Author Biography

Serhii Feduniak, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

Doctor of Political Science, Professor of International Relations

References

1. Dobrzhanska O. Meta i zavdannia Skhidnoho partnerstva // Naukovo-teoretychnyi i hromadsʼko-politychnyi alʼmanakh «Hrani». 2011. Vypusk 6. S. 145-149.
2. Dobrzhanska O. Rezulʼtaty implementatsii initsiatyvy «Skhidne partnerstvo» Ukrainoiu na kinetsʼ 2013 r. // Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetsʼkoho universytetu: Zbirnyk naukovykh pratsʼ. Istoria. Politychni nauky. Mizhnarodni vidnosyny. Chernivrsi: Chernivetsʼkyi universytet, 2014. Vyp. 702-703. S. 114-119.
3. Maksymenko I. Ukrainsʼkyi chynnyk zovnishnioi polityky Evropeisʼkoho Soiuzu vidnosno derzav Skhidnoho partnerstva // Visnyk ONU im. I.I.Mechnykova. Sotsiolohia i politychni nauky. 2014. Т. 19. Vyp. 2 (21). S. 78-87.
4. Palahniuk Y. Zmist ta perspektyvy Politiky Skhidnoho partnerstva iak zovnishniopolitychnoi initsiatyvy shchodo Ukrainy // Derzhavne upravlinnia ta mistseve samovriaduvannia. 2014. Vyp. 2 (21) , S. 13-21.
5. Romaniuk N. «Skhidne partnerstvo» iak instrument posylennia intehratsiinykh protsesiv u Evropi [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: file:///D:/BACKUP/Downloads/UPmcp_2013_2_21 %20(1).pdf 17.
6. Sydoruk T. Polityka susidstva Evropeisʼkoho Soiuzu u Skhidniy Evropi^ modelʼ bez chlenstva: monohrafia. Lviv: PAIS, 2012. 444 s.
7. Spivrobitnytstvo v ramkakh Organizatsii za demokratiu i ekonomichnyi rozvytok. GUAM. Ministerstvo zakordonnykh sprav Ukrainy. URL: https://mfa.gov.ua/ua/about-ukraine/international-organizations/guam.
8. Statut Organizatsii za demokratiu i ekonomichnyi rozvytok – GUAM. Ratyfikovanyi VR Ukrainy 6 bereznia 2008 roku. Zakovodavstvo Ukrainy. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/886_002.
9. Skhidne Partnerstvo. Predstavnytstvo Ukrainy pry Evropeisʼkomu Soiuzi ta Evropeisʼkomy Spivtovarystvi z atomnoi enerhii. URL: https://ukraine-eu.mfa.gov.ua/ua/ukraine-eu/eu-policy/east-partnership.
10. Skhidne Partnerstvo mozhe poshyrytysia na haluzi bezpeky oborony [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://golosukraine.com/ publication/ politika/svit/23981-shidne-partnerstvo-mozhe-poshiritisya-nagaluzi-be.
Add Contributor
12. Chekalenko L. Chy ie prohrama Skhidnoho Partnerstva novoiu modelliu bezpeky? [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.viche.info/journal/4723/.
13. Chumachenko O. Skhidne Partnerstvo dlia Ukrainy: nablyzhennia do ES chy pidmina chlenstva URL: http://vmv.kymu.edu.ua/v/10/11.htm.
14. Dobrzhanska O. Guaranty providing by the European Union in the economy integration in the contest of the Eastern Partnership implementation //Oksana Dobrzhanska // The EU as a Model of Soft Power in the Eastern Neighbourhood, Romania ( Iasi), 15-17 May 2013. – P. 399-406.
15. Dobrzhanska O. Efektyvnistʼ Skhidnoho Partnerstva u poshyrenni demikratii v krainakh Skhidnoi Evropy i Pivdennoho Kavkazu / Oksana Dobrzhanska// Acta Scientifica Academiae Ostroviensis. Sectio A, Nauki Humanistyczne, Społeczne i Techniczne, 2013, P. 129-150.
16. Dobrzhanska O. The EU aspect at the Ukrainian Maidan //Oksana Dobrzhanska //European Union in Times of Crisis. Perspecteves and Solutions, Romania ( Iasi), 8-10 May 2014.
17. Dobrzhanska O. Eastern Partnership: What Options Of Development Are Next For Ukraine? // Ukraine Analityka, Issue (13), 2018, P. 19-25.

Published

2019-12-15

How to Cite

Feduniak, S. (2019). Subregional Projects in the Context of the Development of the EU Eastern Partnership. Modern Historical and Political Issues, (40), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2019.40.76-82