The Humanitarian Space as the Object of the Hybrid War: the Consequences for Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2019.40.146-152

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to study the state of the humanitarian space in the temporarily occupied territories of Lugansk and Donetsk regions, as well as state policy measures to overcome the destructive effects of the hybrid war in the humanitarian sphere in this part of Ukraine. It was stressed that all responsibility for the functioning and maintenance of the occupied territories and their population, according to the norms of international humanitarian law, rests with the occupying state, but the undeclared war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine impedes the application of these norms, so Ukraine supports the citizens and fulfills its positive obligations. before them, take appropriate measures. It is proved that today the history of Ukraine remains an instrument of ideological manipulation, which creates threats to the internal consolidation of society. The promotion of national values through the restoration of historical memory is an important tool in shaping public relations and developing a sustainable democracy. The findings emphasize that overcoming the effects of hybrid aggression against Ukraine implies the presence of political will and state-administrative decisions to strengthen the protection of the state and society from existing and potential threats, the formation and implementation of a holistic humanitarian policy as a complex of educational, linguistic, cultural policy, political history memory and a balanced policy in the field of state-confessional relations. Education of patriotism, psychological and physical readiness to defend the Fatherland, encouragement to participate in socio-political processes, stimulation of independent economic activity – become relevant goals for all age groups of the population and the tasks of educational and educational activities of state authorities, non-governmental organizations and associations.

Keywords: humanitarian policy, hybrid war, culture, education, religion, consciousness manipulation.

Author Biography

Oleg Barna

Member of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine of the 8th convocation

References

1. Hatchinson D. Kulturnyi i politychnyi natsionalizm // Natsionalizm: Antolohiia. 2-he vyd. / Uporiadnyky O. Protsenko, V. Lisovyi. – K.: Smoloskyp, 2006. – S. 499-507.
2. Dzheimison, Fredryk. Postmodernizm, abo Lohika kultury piznoho kapitalizmu / Per. z anhl. i pisliamova P. Denyska. – K.: «Kurs», 2008. – 504 s.
3. Zlobina T.H. Rol kulturnoho prostoru u protsesi stanovlennia ukrainskoi politychnoi natsii: avtoref. dys. kand. filos. nauk: 21.03.01 T.H.Zlobina ; Rada nats. bezpeky ta oborony; Nats. in.-t problem mizhn. bezpeky. K., 2009. 24 s.
4. Informatsiino-analitychni materialy shchodo potochnoho stanu sprav diialnosti MTOT stanom na 04.09.2019. URL: https://mtot.gov.ua/ua/informacino-analitichni-materiali-schodo-potochnogo-stanu-sprav-dijalnosti-mtot-stanom-na-04092019 (data perehliadu 10 veresnia 2019 r.).
5. Karlova V. Mistse ta rol humanitarnoho prostoru derzhavy u formuvanni natsionalnoi samosvidomosti // Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia. 2011. Vyp. 1. S. 40-47.
6.  Kontseptsiia vprovadzhennia mediaosvity v Ukraini (skhvaleno Postanovoiu Prezydii NAPN Ukrainy vid 21.04.2016 r. № 1-2/7-110) URL: http://naps.gov.ua/uploads/files/sod/media-edu.docx (data perehliadu 10 veresnia 2019 r.).
7. Kremlivska ahresiia proty Ukrainy: rozdumy v konteksti viiny : monohrafiia / O. S. Vlasiuk, S. V. Kononenko. – K. : NISD, 2017. – 304 s.
8. Lisovyi V. Kultura – ideolohiia – polityka. K.: Vyd-vo imeni Oleny Telihy, 1997. – 352 s.
9. Mahda Ye. Hibrydna viina: pytannia i vidpovidi. URL: https://ms.detector.media/ trends/1411978127/ gibridna_viyna_pitannya_i_vidpovidi/ (data perehliadu 10 veresnia 2019 r.).
10.  Maineke F. Zahalnyi pohliad na natsiiu, natsionalnu derzhavu i kosmopolityzm // Natsionalizm: Antolohiia. 2-he vyd. Uporiad. O.Protsenko, V.Lisovyi. K.: Smoloskyp, 2006. S. 264-273.
11.  Nora, Pier. Teperishnie, natsiia, pamiat / Per. z frants. Andrii Riepa. – Kyiv: Klio, 2014. – 272 s.
12.  Pro zatverdzhennia Derzhavnoi tsilovoi sotsialnoi prohramy «Molod Ukrainy» na 2016–2020 roky ta vnesennia zmin do deiakykh postanov Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy»: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 18.02.2016 r. № 148 URL: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/148-2016-%D0%BF (data perehliadu 10 veresnia 2019 r.).
13.  Pro zatverdzhennia Kontseptsii natsionalno-patriotychnoho vykhovannia ditei i molodi, Zakhodiv shchodo realizatsii Kontseptsii natsionalno-patriotychnoho vykhovannia ditei i molodi ta metodychnykh rekomendatsii shchodo natsionalno-patriotychnoho vykhovannia u zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladakh: nakaz MON Ukrainy vid 16.06.2015 r. № 641 URL: http://old.mon.gov.ua/ua/about-ministry/normative/4068- (data perehliadu 10 veresnia 2019 r.).
14.  Pro zatverdzhennia planu zakhodiv, spriamovanykh na realizatsiiu deiakykh zasad derzhavnoi vnutrishnoi polityky shchodo okremykh raioniv Donetskoi ta Luhanskoi oblastei, de orhany derzhavnoi vlady tymchasovo ne zdiisniuiut svoi povnovazhennia. Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 11 sichnia 2017 r. № 8-r. URL: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/249657353 (data perehliadu 10 veresnia 2019 r.).
15.  Pro zatverdzhennia planu zakhodiv, spriamovanykh na realizatsiiu deiakykh zasad derzhavnoi vnutrishnoi polityky shchodo tymchasovo okupovanoi terytorii Avtonomnoi Respubliky Krym ta m. Sevastopolia. Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 28 bereznia 2018 r. № 218-r. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/218-2018-%D1%80 (data perehliadu 10 veresnia 2019 r.).
16.  Pro Stratehiiu natsionalno-patriotychnoho vykhovannia ditei ta molodi na 2016– 2020 roky: Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 13.10. 2015 r. № 580/2015 URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/580/2015 (data perehliadu 10 veresnia 2019 r.).
17.  Riabchuk M. Yu. «Khymera natsionalnoi identychnosti»: kilka metodolohichnykh problem // Naukovi Zapysky Instytutu politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen im. I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy. 2018 / 3-4 (95-96) (traven-serpen). S. 3-30.
18.  Svitova hibrydna viina: ukrainskyi front : monohrafiia / za zah. red. V. P. Horbulina. – K. : NISD, 2017. – 496 s.
19.  Smit Entoni D. Natsionalna identychnist. K.: Osnovy, 1994. – 224 s.
20.  Stepyko M.T. Fenomen politychnoi natsii // Ukrainska politychna natsiia : geneza, stan, perspektyvy V. S. Krysachenko, M. T. Stepyko, O. S. Vlasiuk ta in.; za red. V. S. Krysachenka. K. : NISD, 2006. – 632 s.
21.  Fuko M. Arkheolohiia znannia. – K.: Vyd-vo Solomii Pavlychko «Osnovy», 2003. – 326 s.
22.  Shporliuk R. Formyrovanye sovremennoi Ukraynы: zapadnoe yzmerenye // Perekrestky №1-2/2006. S. 5-38. URL: https://en.ehu.lt/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CrossRoad_1-2_2006.pdf (data perehliadu 10 veresnia 2019 r.).
23.  Gellner E. Nations and Nationalism. – New York: Cornell University Press, 1992. P. 8-12.

Published

2019-12-15

How to Cite

Barna, O. (2019). The Humanitarian Space as the Object of the Hybrid War: the Consequences for Ukraine. Modern Historical and Political Issues, (40), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2019.40.146-152