New Trends in the Domestic and Foreign Policies of Putin’s Russia in Early 21st Century (Part 2)

Authors

  • Ihor Hurak Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University
  • Igor Tsependa Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2022.45.57-70

Keywords:

Russian Federation, foreign policy, Vladimir Putin, authoritarian regime, post-Soviet space, democracy

Abstract

The article is a continuation of the publication from the previous issue of the journal. In the previous part, the main focus was on Russia's domestic political and economic transformation during Vladimir Putin's first presidential term, which clearly shows a refusal from Yeltsin's limited democracy and the establishment of an authoritarian regime with Praetorian features. During his first years as president, Vladimir Putin demonstrated that, contrary to the commitments made by Boris Yeltsin's team at the OSCE Istanbul Summit, he did not intend to reduce Russia's military presence in the post-Soviet space. Conversely, the official Kremlin has intensified diplomatic efforts, which have resulted in an increase in the number of its military bases in the countries of the so-called «Near Abroad». At the same time, steps were taken to demonstrate the growing potential and ambitions of the Russian army. The corresponding activity was accompanied by purposeful actions aimed at building a modern Soviet Union around Russia. To achieve this goal, a wide range of tools was used, ranging from official statements to Moscow-initiated integration projects. The practical consequences of the respective aspirations of the new leadership of the Russian Federation were the signing of agreements on the establishment of the EurAsEC, the Common Economic Space, and the reformatting of the Collective Security Treaty into the CSTO. Analysis of internal and external initiatives of the new leadership of Russia in the period outlined in the article, in comparison with the statements of authoritative researchers, provide grounds to conclude that the construction of an authoritarian regime in the Russian Federation was accompanied by pro-Western rhetoric of its leadership due to the internal weakness of the Russian state in the early XXI century. After Russia’s significant economic growth, complemented by the introduction of comprehensive control within the country by the Kremlin, Vladimir Putin began to gradually abandon the disguise of the true nature of his regime, which soon was manifested through the prism of both tough statements and aggressive steps in the international arena.

Author Biographies

Ihor Hurak, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University

Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor of International Relations

Igor Tsependa, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University

Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor of the Department of International Relations, Rector

References

Aleksandr Lukashenko: Dazhe Lenin i Stalin ne dodumalis do togo, chtoby razdrobit respubliku i vklyuchit v sostav SSSR. 22.08.2002, available at: http://regions.ru/news/821416/ (accessed 28.07.2021).

Alenichev, V. (2015), Putin gotovilsya k vojne vse eti 14 let, available at: https://www.currenttime.tv/a/26945323.html (accessed 29.07.2021).

Bzhezinskyi, Z. (2006), Heostratehichna triada. Bzhezinskyi Zbigniev. Ukraina u heostratehichnomu konteksti, Kyiv, Vyd. dim «Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia», c. 14-68.

Heneral-leitenant Ihor Voronchenko: «Zakhoplennia Krymu pochalosia v 2003 rotsi z konfliktu na Tuzli». 06.02.16, available at: https://www.ukrmilitary.com/2016/02/zakhvat-kryma-nachalsya-v-2003-godu-s-konflikta-na-tuzle.html (accessed 23.07.2021).

Gromyko, A. (2015), Vzlety i padeniya otnoshenij Rossii i Evrosoyuza. Sovremennyj mir i geopolitika, Moskva: Kanon+, c. 267-292.

Hurak I., Tsependa I. (2021), Novi tendentsii u vnutrishnii ta zovnishnii politytsi putinskoi Rosii na pochatku KhKhI st. (Chastyna 1). Istoryko-politychni problemy suchasnoho svitu: Zbirnyk naukovykh statei, Chernivtsi: Chernivetskyi natsionalnyi universytet, t. 44, s. 64-77.

Den v istorii. Konflikt za ostriv Tuzla – RF vpershe sprobuvala zakhopyty krymsku zemliu. 30.09.2014, available at: https://24tv.ua/den_v_istoriyi___konflikt_za_ostriv_tuzla__ rf_vpershe_sprobuvala_zahopiti_krimsku_zemlyu_n490727 (accessed 23.07.2021).

Dohovir mizh Ukrainoiu i Rosiiskoiu Federatsiieiu pro ukrainsko-rosiiskyi derzhavnyi kordon. 23.04.2004, available at: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/643_157 (accessed 27.07.2021).

Zayavlenie gosudarstv – uchastnikov SNG otnositelno polozheniya del v OBSE. 3.07.2004, available at: http://kremlin.ru/supplement/1967 (accessed 12.07.2021).

Ivanov, S. (2004), Vooruzhennye sily Rossii i ee geopoliticheskie prioritety, available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/vooruzhennye-sily-rossii-i-ee-geopoliticheskie-prioritety/ (accessed 17.07.2021).

Intervyu ukrainskim telekanalam «UT-1», «Inter» i «1+1». 26.10.2004, available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/22661 (accessed 10.07.2021).

Kobaladze, G. (2019), Put k vojne. Rossiya i Gruziya v epohu Vladimira Putina, available at: https://www.svoboda.org/a/30135078.html (accessed 23.07.2021).

Kozyrieva, O.V. (2015), Analiz etapiv spivrobitnytstva Ukrainy z postradianskymy krainamy. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky. Elektronne naukove vydannia, vyp. 4, s. 69-72.

Krizhevskij, A. (2013), Vstat, gimn idet, available at: https://www.gazeta.ru/ comments/column/Krizhevsky/5810057.shtml (accessed 20.07.2021).

Malko, R. (2014), Volodymyr Vasylenko: «Shchob Ukraina stala suverennoiu derzhavoiu, bulo potribno pozbutys yadernoi zbroi», available at: https://tyzhden.ua/Politics/107225 (accessed 23.07.2021).

Minasian, R.A. (2016), ODKB: nova forma Orhanizatsii Varshavskoho Dohovoru u 1992 – 2015 rr.? Naukovi pratsi istorychnoho fakultetu Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu, vyp. 45, tom 2, s. 205-208.

Ministerstvo provelo pershyi mizhnarodnyi forum “Suchasnyi dosvid vedennia hibrydnykh konfliktiv. Pryklad Ukrainy”. 14.12.2017, available at: https://mtot.gov.ua/ua/ministerstvo-provelo-pershyj-mizhnarodnyj-forum-suchasnyj-dosvid-vedennya-gibrydnyh-konfliktiv-pryklad-ukrayiny (accessed 27.07.2021).

Neozhidannyj proryv – Belorussiya v sostave Rossii? 14.08.2002, available at: https://www.ntv.ru/novosti/881/, (accessed 24.07.2021).

Neformalna... politekonomiia. U Kyievi zavershyvsia samit SND. 30.01.2003, available at: http://kreschatic.kiev.ua/ua/2220/art/9997.html (accessed 27.07.2021).

Nikolska P., Kozlov V., Yakoreva A., Miazyna O., Kozhukhar H. (2016). Chechnia Kadyrova: Shcho treba znaty pro kavkazku respubliku, available at: https://ua.112.ua/statji/chechnia-kadyrova-shcho-treba-znaty-pro-kavkazku-respubliku-288790.html (accessed 28.07.2021).

Othranichiennyi kontinhient. 25.04.2005, available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/ 572812 (accessed 23.07.2021).

Polovyi, T.Ie. (2014), Formuvannia “osoblyvykh vidnosyn” mizh respublikoiu Bilorus i Rosiiskoiu Federatsiieiu v seredyni 90-kh rokiv KhKh stolittia. Prykarpatskyi visnyk NTSh. Dumka, № 3, c. 143-158.

Rossiyu ne dolzhno ustraivat prisutstvie vneregionalnyh derzhav na prostranstve byvshego SSSR – zamglavy MID RF. 12.05.2004, available at: https://sputnik-georgia.ru/society/ 20040512/257948.html (accessed 15.07.2021).

Rudych, F. (2006), Politychne liderstvo v krainakh SND i Baltii: zahalne, osoblyve. Politychnyi menedzhment, № 2, c. 3-18.

Sushko, O., Lisnychuk, O. (2002), YevrAzES yak zasib konservatsii statusu autsaidera? Natsionalna bezpeka i oborona, № 12 (36), c. 48-50.

Tomilov I.S. Harakteristika vyborov v Gosudarstvennuyu dumu Rossijskoj Federacii v 2003-2011 gg. available at: http://st-hum.ru/content/tomilov-harakteristika-vyborov-v-gosudarstvennuyu-dumu-rossiyskoy-federacii-v-2003-2011-gg (accessed 28.07.2021).

Uhoda pro formuvannia Yedynoho ekonomichnoho prostoru. 20.04.2004, available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/997_990 (accessed 24.07.2021).

Ukraina ta Yevraziiske ekonomichne spivtovarystvo: intehratsiia chy spivrobitnytstvo (Analitychna dopovid Tsentru Razumkova) (2002). Natsionalna bezpeka i oborona, № 12 (36), c. 2-37.

Filipchuk, V., Sushko, O. (2005), Yedynyi ekonomichnyi prostir: heopolitychnyi proekt pid ekonomichnymy lashtunkamy, available at: http://www.ea-ua.info/main.php?parts_id=5 &news_id=115&news_show_type=1 (accessed 27.07.2021).

Tsybuliak, A.H. (2010), Rol ODKB i ShOS u stratehii viiskovo-politychnoi bezpeky Rosiiskoi Federatsii. Aktualni problemy mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn. Vyp. 93 (Chastyna II). С. 80-91.

Shlapak, O. (2002), Ukraina ta Yevraziiske ekonomichne spivtovarystvo. Natsionalna bezpeka i oborona, № 12 (36), c. 45-47.

Anne le Huérou Amandine Regamey. Massacres of Civilians in Chechnya. 9.03.2015, available at: https://www.sciencespo.fr/mass-violence-war-massacre-resistance/en/document/massacres-civilians-chechnya.html (accessed 16.07.2021).

Annual Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation.08.07.2000, available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/21480 (accessed 07.07.2021).

Annual Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. 03.04.2001, available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/21216 (accessed 07.07.2021).

Annual Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. 18.04.2002, available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/21567 (accessed 03.07.2021).

Annual Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. 16.05.2003, available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/21998 (accessed 04.07.2021).

Annual Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. 25.04.2005, available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/22931 (accessed 27.08.2013).

Istanbul document 1999, Istanbul, 252 p.

Lachowski, Z. (2005), Polityka bezpieczeństwa wojskowego: brak globalnej strategii, selektywne podejście. Rocznik Strategiczny 2004/05. Przegląd sytuacji politycznej, gospodarczej i wojskowej w środowisku międzynarodowym Polski, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo naukowe Scholar, s. 96-126.

Menkiszak, M. (2005), Rosja autorytarna i mocarstwowa. Rocznik Strategiczny 2004/05. Przegląd sytuacji politycznej, gospodarczej i wojskowej w środowisku międzynarodowym Polski, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo naukowe Scholar, s. 196-219.

Press Conference with Russian and Foreign Media. 20.06.2003, available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/22028 (accessed 04.07.2021).

Press Conference with Russian and Foreign Media. 23.12.2004, available at: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/22757 (accessed 04.07.2021).

The Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation. Approved by the President of the Russian Federation V.Putin June 28, 2000. 28.06.2000, available at: https://fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/doctrine/econcept.htm (accessed 17.06.2014).

Published

2022-06-27

How to Cite

Hurak, I., & Tsependa, I. (2022). New Trends in the Domestic and Foreign Policies of Putin’s Russia in Early 21st Century (Part 2). Modern Historical and Political Issues, (45), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2022.45.57-70