Formation of e-Governance in the Republic of Bulgaria as a Factor of Modernization of Public Administration

Authors

  • Vira Burdiak Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University
  • Ruslana Klym Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2022.45.140-152

Keywords:

Republic of Bulgaria, Ministerial Council, e-Government, e-governance, European Union, European Commission, European Parliament

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to study the formation and development of e-government in Bulgaria, as a factor in the modernization of public administration, assessment of trends in the use of administrative e-services based on the analysis of the current situation. The following tasks are solved in the article: the formation of e-government and e-government in Bulgaria is substantiated; e-government reforms are considered; current trends in the development of e-government and e-government as an institutional structure of Bulgaria are studied. The term “Bulgarian e-government” was first used in the Unified system of registration of civil status acts and administrative services in 1977. A successful unified registry of civil status acts provided effective access to citizens and organizations to obtain certificates, copies of civil status acts, forms building permits, use permits, duties, tax regulations. The political changes of 1989 and the democratization of the Republic of Bulgaria caused the need for a new administrative and legal framework, and the preparation for joining the EU – a certain renaissance of the e-government in a new phase and form. In 2005, the Republic of Bulgaria adopted modern national legislation in terms of interoperability with the EU, the National Information Society Strategy, which put the Republic of Bulgaria among the first European countries with such a direction of action. At the same time, there is low confidence in e-services in the Republic of Bulgaria, which is indirectly observed due to too low a percentage of e-purchases. Even in the capital, Sofia, the types of pre-paid services are very limited – instead the practice of payment on delivery is very common. Only business is the bearer of all risks. New generations of users with IT literacy are slowly mastering these changes. Still, gradually, the benefits of more efficient administration and business based on integrated data registers with shared responsibilities are becoming, despite all the difficulties, the best choice for many people. Now the process of e-governance reforms in the Republic of Bulgaria is a component of a new political and economic model of development. For the complete modernization of Public Administration in the Republic of Bulgaria, broad consultations should be introduced between the State agency, the Operator of the Unified System, business and manufacturing, on the one hand, and citizens, on the other. Such actions, combined with reforms, will significantly accelerate the modernization of Public Administration in the state.

Author Biographies

Vira Burdiak, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

Doctor of Political Science, Professor Department of Political Science and Public Administration

Ruslana Klym, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

PhD student, Department of Political Science and Public Administration

References

Burdiak, V. (2021), Politychnyi protses u Bolharii: nevdala koalitsiada ta treti vprodovzh roku vybory do parlamentu, Mediaforum: analityka, prohnozy, informatsiinyi menedzhment, (9), 28-49.

2.Vyrovyi, S.I., Diachenko, N.P. (2014), Publichne vriaduvannia: problemy teorii ta praktyky, Publichne upravlinnia: shliakhy rozvytku, Kyiv, NADU, (1), 61-62.

3.Vrbanov, R. (2007), Elektronno pravitelstvo i elektronni uslugi, Sofija.

Havkalova N.L. (2014), Publichne upravlinnia: metodolohichnyi aspekt, Publichne upravlinnia: shliakhy rozvytku, Kyiv, NADU, (1), 16–18.

Gogolev, A.M. (2015), Publichnoe administrirovanie kak pravovaya kategoriya, Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo, № 3, 141-146.

Dobrev, B.E. (2005), P'tevoditel za elektronno pravitelstvo, Sofiya.

Doklad za s'stoyanieto na administratsiyata prez 2007 g. (2008), Sofiya, Ministerstvo na d'rzha-vnata administratsiya i administrativnata reforma.

Doklad za s'stoyanieto na administratsiyata prez 2008 g. (2009), Sofiya, Ministerstvo na d'rzha-vnata administratsiya i administrativnata reforma.

Edinen portal za elektronni administrativni uslugi (2015), URL: https://egov.bg/wps/portal/en. UNDP (2009),

Elektronno upravlenie v kraya na tunela (2016), Kapital, 10.06.2016. ULR: http://www.capital. bg/politika_i_ikonomika/bulgaria/2016/06/10/2775252_elektron-no_upravlenie_v_ kraia_na_tunela/.

Zakon za elektronnoto upravlenie (2009), UNDP, E-Government in Bulgaria, Project Code: 00011716, Final CCICMT Report, URL: http://www.еg.government.bg/upload/docs/2016-07//ZAKON_za_elektron-noto_upravlenie.pdf.

Zarubizhnyi dosvid publichnoho administruvannia (2010), Kyiv, NADU.

Indeks za digitalna ikonomika i obschestvo, DESI (2021), ULR: https:// digital-strategy.ec. europa.eu/en/policies/desi-bulgaria.

Kiskinov, V. (2003), Elektronno pravitelstvo, Sofiya, SIBI.

Mihaleva, S. (2009), Kontseptsiyata «Elektronno pravitelstvo» v konteksta na elektronnoto upravlenie, ULR: https://ejournal.vfu.bg/en/pdfs/Svetla_MihalevaKon-cepciata%27Elektronno_ pravitelstvo%27v_kontektsta_na_elektronnoto_upravlenie.

Nikolina, I., Bavarovska, L. (2021). Porivnialnyi analiz rozvytku e-uriaduvannia Ukrainy ta Bolharii, InterConf, (93),157-161,ULR: https://doi.org/10.51582/interсonf.

Osnovni prioriteti za razvitie na IKT (2015), URL: https://ec.europa. eu/priorities/digital-single-market_en.

Postanovlenie (1977) № 15 na Ministerskiya s'vet ot 1977 g. za Vnedryavane na edinnata sistema za grazhdanska registratsiya i administrativno obsluzhvane na naselenieto i za izmenenie i dop'lnenie na naredbata za grazhdanskoto s'stoyanie. ULR: https://www.ciela.net/svobodna-zona-darjaven-vestnik/document/-1092339200/issue/876/postanovlenie-%E2%84%96-15-na-ministerskiya-savet-ot-1977-g-za-vnedryavane-na-edin-nata-sistema-za-grazhdanska-registratsiya-i-administra-tivno -obsluzhvane-na-naselenieto-i-za-izmenenie-i-dopalnenie-na-naredbata-za-grazhdanskoto-sastoyanie.

Postanovlenie (1998) № 40 na Ministerskiya s'vet ot 17 fevruari 1998 g. za s'zdavane na koordinatsionen s'vet po problemite na informatsionnoto obschestvo. ULR:https://www.ciela.net/ svobodna-zona-darjaven-vestnik/document/-1086837248/issue/1374/postanovlenie-%E2%40-na-ministerskiya-savet-ot-17-fev-ruari-1998-g-za-sazdavane-na-koordinatsionen-savet-po-problemite-na-informatsionnoto-obshtestvo.

Pravets (1984). ULR: http://pravetz.bg/history/.

PROON. Doklad o razvitii cheloveka (2009), Preodolenie barerov: cheloveche-skaya mobilnost i razvitie. Opublikovano dlya Programmyi razvitiya OON (PROON), M., «Ves Mir», URL: https://www.un.org/ru/development/hdr/2009/hdr_2009_comp-lete.pdf.

Publichne upravlinnia ta administruvannia v umovakh informatsiinoho suspilstva: vitchyznianyi i zarubizhnyi dosvid (2016), Zaporizhzhia, ZDIA.

Rae A., Tsitselkov S., Decheva R., Sm'v'rake K. (2016), Preotkrivane na publichnite uslugi za 21-vi vek. Sravnitelen analiz na elektronnite reformi v Estoniya, B'lgariya i Rumyiniya, Sofiya, Evropeyski liberalen forum.

Republika B'lgariya (2019), D'rzhavna agentsiya «Elektronno upravlenie», URL: https://e-gov.bg/wps/portal/ agency/home.

Strategiya za elektronno upravlenie v Republika B'lgariya 2010-2015 (2010), URL: https://www.mtitc.government.bg/upload/docs/eGovStrategy.pdf.

Ukaz (1985), № 2472/1985 za Administrativno-pravnoto obsluzhvane na naselenieto, ULR: http:// www.mtitc.government.bg/upload/docs/eGovStrategy.pdf.

Hristov, P. (2016), Elektronnoto upravlenie sche zaraboti do 4 godini, ULR: http://web.barometar. net/85271/.

Chernov, S.I., Haiduchenko, S.O. (2014), Tekst lektsii z dystsypliny «Publichne administruvan-nia», Kharkiv, KhNUMH.

Carter, L., Belanger, F. (2004), The Utilization of E-government Services, Citizen Trust, Innovation And Acceptance Factors.

e-Governance Strategy of Bulgaria, MTITC (2013). URL: https://www.mtitc.government.bg/ upload/ docs/2014-07/e_Governance_Strategy_Draft.pdf.

e-Governance Strategy of Bulgaria, MTITC, (2014). URL: https://www.mtitc.government.bg/ upload/ docs/2014-07/e_Governance_Strategy_Draft.pdf.

EU IDAbc, Interoperable Delivery of European e-Government Services to public Administrations, Business and Citizens (2009), URL: http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/en/ chapter/3.html.

European Commission (2004), An official website of the European Union, URL: www.ec.europa.eu/index_en. htm.

European e-Government Action Plan 2016-2020 (2016), URL: https:// ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/ european-egovernment-action-plan-2016-2020.

European e-Justice, European e-Justice Portal, URL: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/criminal/european-ejustice/ index_en.htm.

Haag St., M. Cummings, A. Phillips (2007), Management Information Systems for the Information Age.

IDABC (2005), presented "The Power of Communities" at Open World Forum, ULR: http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/en/ chapter/6031.

Petrov, K. (2020), Problem Aspects of E-Governance and E-Learning Management in Bulgaria, EJBMR, European Journal of Business and Management Research, V. 5, № 6, URL: https://www.ejbmr.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/ view/ 591

Santiago, E. (2008), The Development оf а Model For Municipal е-government іn Puerto Rico And іts Evalution Tools. Puerto Rico.

Silcock, R. (2001), What is E-government? ParliamentaryAffairs.

Sprecher, M. (2000), Racing to e-government, Using the Internet for Citizen Service Delivery.

UN E-Government Survey (2016). URL: https:// publicadministration.un. org/egovkb/en-us/ Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2016 UN.

Published

2022-06-27

How to Cite

Burdiak, V., & Klym, R. (2022). Formation of e-Governance in the Republic of Bulgaria as a Factor of Modernization of Public Administration. Modern Historical and Political Issues, (45), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2022.45.140-152