Civilizational Changes in the Post-Soviet Space and the Decommunization of Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2022.45.247-254Keywords:
civilization, reflection, limitroph, decommunization, memoryAbstract
The article defines civilization as a human community. which for a certain period of time (the process of origin, development, death or transformation of civilization) has stable special features in socio-political organization, economy and culture (science, technology, art, etc.) common spiritual values and ideals, mentality (worldview). The question of the regionality of the civilization to which Ukraine belongs, as well as its limitrophy, ie the intermediate between Western European and Eurasian civilizations, is raised. It is emphasized that Ukraine's civilizational progress in Europe is intensified by the decommunization of the social and political life of our society. Decommunization is one of the few reforms that has been implemented since the Revolution of Dignity. With the adoption of decommunization laws, the policy of changing the historical narrative and the formation of cultural memory became official and purposeful. This process has an objective basis, its cataloging was the events of Euromaidan, but even more so - the Russian war against Ukraine. At the same time, it is impossible not to mention the influence of the past on ways of thinking and social structure, ie historical memory. The article notes that the process of creating new memorable meanings in a transitional society is a necessary condition for overcoming the dualism of the historical memory of Ukrainians. In this sense, the state policy of memory should be focused on the destruction of totalitarian attitudes and stereotypes, the formation of a unifying system of values.
References
Artiukh, V. (2007). Deshcho pro polityku istorychnoi pamiati, rezhym dostupu: http://www.pravoslavya.sumy.ua/readarticle.php?article_id=11 (accessed 10.03.2022).
Vulf, L. (2003). Izobrietaia Vostochnuiu Yevropu: Karta tsivilizatsii v soznanii epokhi Prosvieshchieniia. Novoie litieraturnoie obozrieniie, Moskva, 560 s.
Huryk, M. (2016). Dekomunizatsiia yak shliakh pobudovy ukrainotsentrychnoi modeli istorychnoi pamiati. Aktualni problemy filosofii ta sotsiolohii, Vyp. 11, s. 26-29.
Kyrydon, A. (2009). Kontsept «istorychna pamiat»: variatyvnist definiiuvannia. Ukraina – Yevropa – Svit: mizhnarodnyi zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Seriia «Istoriia, mizhnarodni vidnosyny», Vyp. 3, Vyd-vo TNPU im. V. Hnatiuka, Ternopil.
Kobchenko, K. (2016). Dekomunizatsiia v Ukraini: postkolonialnyi kontekst. Ukrainoznavchyi almanakh, Vyp. 19.
Kononenko, P., Kononenko, T. (2015). Ukraina v nas odna, Kn. 3. Dzhura, Ternopil, 664 s.
Kuchma, L. (2003). Ukraina – nie Rossiia. Vriemia, Moskva, 560 s.
Mikhalchienko, N. (2001). Ukrainskoie obshchiestvo: transformatsiia, modiernizatsiia ili limitrof Yevropy? Instytut sotsiolohii NANU, Kyiv, 440 s.
Nahorna, L. (2012). Istorychna pamiat: teorii, dyskursy, refleksii. IPiEND, Kyiv, 328 s.
Ohryzko, V. (2012). Nova Rosiia, stara Malomoskoviia... Den, № 43, 13 berez., rezhym dostupu: http://www.day.kiev.ua/224984# (accessed 10.03.2022).
Piliaiev, I. (2012). Ukraina-2012: problema tsyvilizatsiinoho ta heopolitychnoho vyboru. Naukovyi visnyk Dyplomatychnoi akademii Ukrainy, Vyp. 18, DAU pry MZS Ukrainy, Kyiv.
Rymarenko, Yu. (1995). Natsionalnyi rozvii Ukrainy: problemy i perspektyvy. Yurinkom, Kyiv, 1995, 272 s.
Skorokhod, O. (2016). «Ne varto robyty z Bandery holovnoho natsionalnoho heroia v ukrainskii istorii», - istoryk Oleksandr Zaitsev, rezhym dostupu: http://censor.net.ua/resonance/ 392340/ne_varto_robiti_zbanderi_golovnogo_natsonalnogo_geroya_v_ukranskyi_stor_storik_oleksandr_zayitsev (accessed 10.03.2022).
Smit, E. (1994). Natsionalna identychnist. Osnovy, Kyiv, 224 s.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.