Neo-Ottomanism as the Basis of Turkey’s Middle East Policy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2020.42.99-108

Keywords:

Turkey, Turkey’s Middle East policy, Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP), neo-Ottomanism

Abstract

In the article the author emphasizes that Turkey’s current course of foreign policy is a reflection of its fear to remain a secondary, buffer state against the background of the past greatness of the Ottoman Empire. The author elucidates it as a reason that Turkey regards the traditional basis of its foreign policy (Ottomanism, Pan-Turkism) that is radically different to the pro-Western Kemalism. Direction of Turkish foreign policy towards neo-Ottomanism is explained by the peculiarities of geopolitics of the post-bipolar period, existence of the conflict identities, aspiration to take responsibility for the negative (from Turkey’s perspective) processes in the countries of the “Ottoman legacy” (European, Asian, African areas) and other. It is highlighted that Turkey aims to reach a new (supraregional) level through the revival of political Islam, Ottoman traditions and ideology, however, officially it distancing itself from neo-Ottomanism in order to avoid accusations of its commitment to expansionism.

Author Biography

Nataliia Khoma, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Doctor of Political Sciences, рrofessor with the Department of Political Science and International Relations

References

Altunışık, M. B., Tür, O. (2006), From Distant Neighbors to Partners? Changing Syrian-Turkish Relations, Security Dialogue, Vol. 37 No 2, pp. 229-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010606066172

Atli, A. (2011), Businessmen as Diplomats: The Role of Business Associations in Turkey’s Foreign Economic Policy, Insight Turkey, Vol. 13 No 1, рр. 109-128.

Balakhova, Z. (2016), National role conception in foreign policy of a modern state, Science and World, Vol. 7 No. 35, pp. 108-110.

Barchard, D. (1985), Turkey and the West. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Bengio, O., Özcan, G. (2001), Old Grievances, New Fears: Arab Perceptions of Turkey and Its Alignment with Israel, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 37 No 2, pp. 50-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/714004395

Çevik, S. B. (2019), Turkish historical television series: public broadcasting of neo-Ottoman illusions”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Vol. 19 No 2, pp. 227-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1622288

Chih-yu Shih (1992), Seeking Common Causal Maps: A Cognitive Approach to International Organization. In: Contending Dramas: A Cognitive Approach to International Organization. New York: Praeger.

Claims of axis shift stem from ignorance, bad intentions, says Gül (15 June 2010), Today’s Zaman.

Çolak, Y. (2006), Ottomanism vs. Kemalism: Collective Memory and Cultural Pluralism in 1990s Turkey, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 587-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200600642274

Cornell, S. E. (2012), What Drives Turkish Foreign Policy? Middle East Quarterly Iss. 19 No 1, pp. 13-24.

Coşar, N., Demirci, S. (2006), The Mosul Question and the Turkish Republic: Before and After the Frontier Treaty, 1926, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 42 No 1, pp. 123-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200500399611

Davutoğlu, A. (2001), Stratejik Derinlik, Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları.

Demiroğlu, U. (2013), The Effects of the Investment Decline on Potential GDP in Turkey’s 2001 and 2009 Crises, Central Bank Review, Vol. 13 No 3, pp. 25-44.

Gurkaynak, R. S., Sayek-Boke, S. (2013), AKP Döneminde Türkiye Ekonomisi, Birikim, No. 296, pp. 64-69.

Gürzel, A. (2014), Turkey’s role as a regional and global player and its power capacity: Turkey’s engagement with other emerging states, Revista de Sociologia e Política, Vol. 22 No 50, pp. 95-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987314225007

Hoffmann, C., Cemgil, C. (2016), The (un)Making of the Pax Turca in the Middle East: Understanding the Social Historical Roots of Foreign Policy, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 29 No 4, pp. 1279-1302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2015.1119015

Holsti, K. J. (1970), National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 233-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3013584

Hounshell, B. (2010), “Mr. Zero Problems”. Foreign Policy, Vol. 183, pp. 45-46.

Hristov, I. (2019), Neo-Ottomanism – Emergence, Ideology and Political Doctrine. Social Evolution and History, Vol. 18 No 1, pp. 139-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30884/seh/2019.01.08

Karpat, K. H. (2002), Studies on Ottoman Social and Political History: Selected Articles and Essays. Boston: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400899

Keating, J. E. (2010), The World’s Kissingers. Foreign Policy No 178.

Kirişçi, K. (2009), The Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy: The Rise of the Trading State, New Perspectives on Turkey, Vol. 40, pp. 29-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896634600005203

Kirişçi, K., Kaptanoğlu, N. (2011), The Politics of Trade and Turkish Foreign Policy, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 47 No 5, pp. 705-724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2011.613226

Kutlay, M. (2011), Economy as the "Practical Hand" of New Turkish Foreign Policy: A Political Economy Explanation, Insight Turkey, Vol. 13 No 1, pp. 67-88.

Mufti, M. (2016), Daring and Caution in Turkish Strategic Culture. Republic at Sea. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Nehme, M. (1 May 2020), Erdogan’s neo-Ottoman dreams was on Libya’s shores, The Arab Weekly.

Oğuzlu, T. H. (2008), Middle Easternization of Turkey’s Foreign Policy: Does Turkey Dissociate from the West? Turkish Studies, Vol. 9 No, pp. 3-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840701813960

Öniş, Z. (2009), Beyond the 2001 Financial Crisis: The Political Economy of the New Phase of Neo-Liberal Restructuring in Turkey, Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 16 No 3, pp. 409-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802408642

Öniş, Z., Yilmaz, Ş. (2009), Between Europeanization and Euro-Asianism: Foreign Policy Activism in Turkey during the AKP Era, Turkish Studies, Vol. 10 No 1, pp. 7-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840802648562

Özcan, N. A., Özdamar, Ö. (2010), Uneasy Neighbors: Turkish-Iranian Relations since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Middle East Policy, Vol. 17 No 3, pp. 101-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4967.2010.00454.x

Ozkan, B. (2014), Turkey, Davutoglu and the Idea of Pan-Islamism. Survival, Vol. 56 No 4, pp. 119-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2014.941570

Pope, H. (2010), Pax Ottomana: The Mixed Success of Turkey’s New Foreign Policy, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 89 No 6, pp. 161-171.

Sözen, A. (2010), A Paradigm Shift in Turkish Foreign Policy: Transition and Challenges, Turkish Studies, Vol. 11 No 1, pp. 103-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683841003747062

Subaşat, T. (2014), The Political Economy of Turkey’s Economic Miracle, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 16 No 2, pp. 137-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2014.910396

Taspinar, Ö. (2008), Turkey’s Middle East Policies: Between Neo-Ottomanism and Kemalism. Carnegie Papers No 10. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Publications Department.

Taspinar, Ö. (2011), The Rise of Turkish Gaullism: Getting Turkish-American Relations Right, Insight Turkey, Vol. 13 No 1, pp. 11-17.

Tezcür, G. M., Grigorescu, A. (2014), Activism in Turkish Foreign Policy: Balancing European and Regional Interests, International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 15 No 3, pp. 257-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12004

Volokhov, V. (2019), Middil East: Stabile Instabiliy. Available from https://bintel.org.ua/en/analytics/geopolitics/blizkij-sxid-stabilna-nestabilnist/ [Accessed 08.11.2020].

Yavuz, M. H. (1998), Turkish Identity and Foreign Policy in Flux: The Rise of Neo-Ottomanism, Critique: Critical Studies of the Middle East, Vol. 7 No 12, pp. 19-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10669929808720119

Downloads

Published

15-12-2020

How to Cite

Khoma, N. (2020). Neo-Ottomanism as the Basis of Turkey’s Middle East Policy . Modern Historical and Political Issues, (42), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2020.42.99-108

Most read articles by the same author(s)