The Relationship of Globalization, Internationalization and State Building in the Modern World
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2021.43.57-63Keywords:
Globalization, State Building, Integration, Internationalization, Transnational CorporationsAbstract
The progress of globalization over the last few years has caused academic and political discussion worldwide. The opinions of experts and politicians vary on the nature of globalization, its driving forces, and consequences for civilization, nevertheless, the overwhelming majority of scholars agree that globalization is a key concept that ensures understanding of the essence of the transition of human society into the third millennium and the most demanded means of comprehending the essence of transformations of the world order at the turn of the 21st century. Globalization itself is a global problem of paramount importance, holding unique opportunities and existential threats. It opens fascinating prospects, and at the same time aggravates old diseases, and creates new threats and dangers. One of the most pressing issues of contemporary political science is whether the institution of the state will remain in the global world order, or whether it is doomed to be abolished by globalization. The wide variety of opinions and methodological approaches to the study of the phenomenon of globalization testifies that this phenomenon can be understood only by means of a comprehensive study of its main aspects.
References
Bilorus O. H. (2001), Hlobalni transformatsii i ukrainskyi shliakh onovlennya i rozvytku u XXI stolitti. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannia, №. 3, s. 37 – 48.
Yakovets Yu.V. (2013), Globalizatsiya i vzaimodeystviye tsivilizatsiy. Ekonomika, Moscow.
Wallerstein I. (2006), Geopoliticheskie mirosistemnye izmeneniya: 1945 – 2025 gody. Voprosy ekonomiki, №. 4, s. 83.
Slovnyk inshomovnykh sliv (1975). Main edition of the Ukrainian Soviet Encyclopedia, Kyiv, 996 s.
King A., Schneider B. (1991), Pervaya globalnaya revolyutsiya. Doklad Rimskogo kluba. Progress-Pangea, Moscow, 1991.
Kenichi Ohmae (1990), The Borderless World : Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy. Harper Business, New York, p. 243.
Nesbitt J., Eburdin P. (1992), Chto nas zhdet v 90-e gody. Megatendentsii: god 2000. Respublika, Moscow, 417 s.
UNIDO (1996), The Globalization of Industry: Implications for Developing Countries be yond 2000. Venn. Dec, p. 2.
Shepelev M.A. (2010), Krizis globalizatsii: perspektivy mirovogo geoekonomicheskogo protsessa i ikh politicheskie posledstviya. Grani, №. 1, s. 86-92.
Elyanov A.Ya. (2004), Globalizatsiya i dogonyayushchee razvitie. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, № 1, s. 3-17.
Chumakov A.N. (2003), Istoricheskiy protsess v kategoriyakh «kultura», «tsivilizatsiya», «globalizatsiya». Materialy postoyanno deystvuyushchego mezhdistsiplinarnogo seminara Kluba uchenykh «Globalny mir». Alpina Pablischer, Moscow, s. 18-23.
Elyanov A.Ya. (2004), Globalizatsiya i dogonyayushchee razvitie. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, № 1, s. 3-17.
Afanasyev M.V., Myasnikova L.A. (2013), Vremya globalizatsii. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, № 10, s. 10-19.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.