Power Structures in the Implementation of Internal Armed Violence: Repression and Terror in the Political Systems Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2021.43.146-157Keywords:
force and law structures, repression and terror, internal armed violence, political systemsAbstract
The practice of using force and law structures in the implementation of repression and terror and the experience of preventing these types of armed violence in different political systems of today are analyzed. The categories “power structures”, “armed violence”, “repression and terror” were defined. It is revealed that in today's essential understanding repression and terror were first used as one of the force tools for stabilizing socio-political processes within the revolutions of the mid-seventeenth - early twentieth centuries and a series of post-revolutionary civil wars and coups d'etat. It is stated that upon completion of the processes of the modern world system formation, which according to I. Wallerstein operates on the basis of market mechanisms, provides for the presence of central, semi-peripheral and peripheral zones with fundamentally different economic potential. The possibility of using repression and terror became directly dependent on the political structure existing in a given country. It is noted that in the liberal-democratic political systems typical of the center of today's world economy, repression and terror as elements of power are completely absent, as it prevents the security forces from entering the political process and public control over their activities. Under the semi-peripheral totalitarian system, the analyzed types of armed violence are an integral part of the state functioning and are used in all social spheres. In authoritarian political systems, typical for the semi-periphery and the periphery, terror is not used, and repression is not the main instrument of domination which is used exactly for political purposes. The structure of the clan-oligarchic system, widespread in the semi-peripheral zone, creates potential opportunities for repression. However, their widespread usage is blocked by elements of facade democracy, which are exploited by economic and political groups in competition with the central government.
References
Arendt Kh. (1963), O revolyutsii, za adresoiu : www.bibikhin.ru/o_revolutsii. (data zvernennia: 22.02.2021).
Bader A. V. (2016), «Vzaiemodiia hromadian iz sylovymy strukturamy yak indykator mozhlyvosti zastosuvannia zbroinoho nasyllia orhanamy derzhavnoi vlady», Naukovo-teoretychnyi almanakh «Hrani», № 9. S. 89-94.
Bader A. V. (2020), «Vydy vnutrishnopolitychnoho zbroinoho nasyllia: terminolohichnyi analiz», Hileia: naukovyi visnyk. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats, Vyp. 153. S. 410-414.
Bushkov A. A. (2004), Stalin. Krasnyy monarkh, Neva, Sankt-Peterburg, 640 s.
Vovk S. O. (2017), Hromadianski viiny: geneza, sutnist, naslidky, Helvetyka, Starobilsk, 304 s.
Hrynenko O. I., Dieniezhkin M. M. (2002), «Problemy formuvannia tsyvilno-viiskovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini», Nauka i oborona, № 2. S. 36-40.
Ilnytska I. V. (2008), «Armiia i polityka: modeli vzaiemodii v umovakh riznykh politychnykh rezhymiv», Visnyk derzhavnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika», № 612. S. 205-211.
Karpinskyi I. (1998), «Armiia i derzhava: politychna subiektyvnist armii v umovakh perekhodu suspilstva do demokratii», Visnyk derzhavnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». «Derzhava ta armiia», № 344. S. 119-127.
Lenin V. I. (1970), «Dopolneniya k proektu vvodnogo zakona k ugolovnomu kodeksu RSFSR i pisma D. I. Kurskomu», Polnoe sobranie sochineniy, T. 45. S. 189.
Lyubashits V. Ya. (2003), «Gosudarstvennaya vlast: ponyatie, osobennosti funktsionirovaniya», Ekonomicheskiy vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, № 2. S. 124-137.
Marks K., Engels F. (1962), Sochineniya : v 50 t., Gospolitizdat, Moskva, T. 28. 1852-1855. S. 490-491.
Mezhenska O. V., Vovk S. O. (2017), Derzhavnyi perevorot: nasylnytskyi sposib pereformatuvannia vlady, DZ «LNU imeni Tarasa Shevchenka», Starobilsk, 232 s.
Pareto V. (2007), Kompendium po obshchey sotsiologii, GU VShE, Moskva, 511 s.
Smolianiuk V. F. (zah. red.), (2002), Politolohiia: pidruch. dlia kursantiv vyshch. viisk. navch. zakl. Zbroi. syl Ukrainy, Nova knyha, Vinnytsia, 446 s.
Russo Zh. Zh. (1998), Ob obshchestvennom dogovore. Traktaty, KANON-press, Moskva, 416 s.
Marchuk V. P. (uklad.), (2003), Slovnychok yurydychnykh terminiv, MAUP, Kyiv, 128 s.
Trebin M. (1999), «Armiia i parlament: problemy vzaiemodii ta kontroliu», Nova polityka, № 3. S. 46-53.
Trebin M. P. (2004), Armiia ta suspilstvo: sotsialno-filosofskyi analiz vzaiemodii v umovakh transformatsii, Vydavn. Dim «Inzhek», Kharkiv, 404 s.
Fayzrakhmanov R. Kh. (2011), «Vooruzhennoe nasilie kak politiko-pravovaya kategoriya: sushchnost i osnovnye priznaki», Biznes, menedzhment, pravo, № 1 (23). S. 146-149.
Fayzrakhmanov R. Kh. (2011), «Gosudarstvennyy suverenitet i vooruzhennoe nasilie v usloviyakh sovremennoy globalizatsii (teoretiko-pravovye i politologicheskie aspekty)», Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, № 2. S. 44-52
Fisun A. A. (2006), Demokratiya, neopatrimonializm i globalnye transformatsii, Konstanta, Kharkov, 352 s.
Frolov N. S. (1999), Tragediya naroda, Pamyat, Kazan, 320 s.
Khanstatynov V. O. (2011), «Tysk avtorytarnoi svidomosti na tsinnosti tolerantnosti», Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova, № 6. S. 96-103.
Khmel A. O. (2010), «Fransisko Franko: vid soldata do hlavy derzhavy (politychnyi portret)», Naukovi pratsi Chornomorskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly, Seriia : Istoriia, T. 140. Vyp. 127. S. 72-77.
Chellen R. (2008), Gosudarstvo kak forma zhizni, Ros. polit. entsikl. (ROSSPEN), Moskva, 319 s.
Cheremiskina N. (2002), «Tsyvilnyi kontrol nad voiennoiu orhanizatsiieiu derzhavy», Nova polityka, №2. S. 42-45.
Chukanov I. A. (2013), «Repressii kak odna iz kraeugolnykh osnov totalitarnogo stroya sotsialisticheskogo tolka», Simbirskiy nauchnyy vestnik, №1 (11). S. 78-89.
Deivis Ya. (red.) (2016), SIPRI 2015: Shchorichnyk: Ozbroiennia, rozzbroiennia ta mizhnarodna bezpeka, per. z anhl. Shanhina L. (hol. red. ukr. vyd.), Zapovit, Kyiv, 688 s.
Yakovlev A. N. (1995), Po moshcham eley, Yevraziya, Moskva, 191 s.
Bader A. (2020), «Repressions as a type of international political armed violence», Slovak international scientific journal, №38. Vol. 1. P. 51-53.
Wallerstein I. (1991), Unthinking Social Science. The Limits of Nineteenth-Century Paradigms, Polity Press, Cambridge, 280 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
