Digital Authoritarianism: Concept, Features, Threats

Nataliia Khoma; Maiia Nikolaieva

doi:10.31861/mhpi2022.46.159-166

Authors

Nataliia Khoma Lviv Polytechnic National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2507-5741
Maiia Nikolaieva Odesa I.I. Mechnikov National University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0056-0553

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2022.46.159-166

Keywords:

non-democratic political regimes, digital technologies, digital authoritarianism, export of authoritarianism, digital rights and freedoms

Abstract

The article examines the content, features and threats of digital authoritarianism. The topic of the research is the result of a change in the configuration of non-democratic political regimes, which actively apply the achievements of scientific and technical progress, digital technologies for the implementation of control and supervisory functions. Digital authoritarianism is interpreted as a new political trend that contains explicit and implicit threats to the future of democracy, which makes its study relevant. The problem was investigated with the help of the methods of neo-institutionalism and the comparative method. The main cases for analysis are China and Russia, since they are the most active in developing, implementing and exporting digital authoritarianism. The aim of the article is to clarify the content of digital authoritarianism, its features, and the consequences of its implementation. To achieve the goal, the task is set: to consider modern approaches to understanding digital authoritarianism in political science; find out how the control and supervisory function of the state is strengthened by means of digital technologies; characterize the activities of authoritarian states regarding the export and import of digital authoritarianism. It is noted that the implementation of the control and supervisory function by authoritarian states through the use of digital technologies and artificial intelligence allows governments to automate the monitoring and tracking of the opposition. Digital tools make it possible for authoritarian regimes to cover a wide network of people with surveillance, which is especially used during mass protests.

Author Biographies

Nataliia Khoma, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Doctor of Political Sciences, рrofessor with the Department of Political Science and International Relations

Maiia Nikolaieva , Odesa I.I. Mechnikov National University

PhD in Political Science, Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science

References

Anthony, M., Iii, V. A. & Gauchan, N. 2019. Dystopia is Now: Digital Authoritarianism and Human Rights in Asia. Global Campus Human Rights Journal, 3(2): 269-286.

Clinton, H. R. 2010. Remarks on Internet Freedom (speech, Washington, DC, January 21, 2010). Available from: https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2010/01/ 135519.htm [25 October 2022].

Coleman, V. & Napolitano, J. 2022. Digital Human Rights Need a Single Home in U.S. Government. Foreign Policy. 14 Mar.

Dickson, B. 2016. The Dictator’s Dilemma: The Chinese Communist Party’s Strategy for Survival. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dobson, W. J. 2012. The Dictator’s Learning Curve: Inside the Global Battle for Democracy. New York: Random House.

Dragu, T. & Lupu, Y. 2021. Digital Authoritarianism and the Future of Human Rights. International Organization, 75(4): 991-1017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000624

Dragu, T. & Przeworski, A. 2019. Preventive Repression: Two Types of Moral Hazard. American Political Science Review, 113(1): 77-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000552

Glenny, M. 2011. DarkMarket: CyberThieves, CyberCops and You, back in the 1990s. New York: Knopf.

Gohdes, A. R. 2020. Repression Technology: Internet Accessibility and State Violence. American Journal of Political Science, 64(3): 488-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12509

Greitens, S. 2020. Surveillance, Security and Liberal Democracy in the Post-COVID World. International Organization, 74(1): 169-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000417

Jones, M. O. 2022. Digital Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Deception, Disinformation and Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kendall-Taylor, A., Frantz, E. & Wright, J. 2020. The Digital Dictators: How Technology Strengthens Autocracy. Foreign Affairs, 99(2): 103-115.

Khalil, L. 2020. Digital Authoritarianism, China and COVID. Available from: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/digital-authoritarianism- china- covid. [12 October 2022].

Kliman, D. & Grace, A. 2018. Power Play: Addressing China’s Belt and Road Strategy. Washington: Center for a New American.

Lee, K.-F. 2018. AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Mare, A. 2020. State-Ordered Internet Shutdowns and Digital Authoritarianism in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Communication, 14: 4244-4263.

Milner, H. V. 2006. The Digital Divide the Role of Political Institutions in Technology Diffusion. Comparative Political Studies, 39(2): 176-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005282983

Morozov, E. 2012. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public Affairs.

Polyakova, A. & Meserole, C. 2019. Exporting Digital Authoritarianism: The Russian and Chinese Models. Democracy & Disorder policy brief. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

Qin, B., Strömberg, D. &, Wu, Y. 2017. Why does China Allow Freer Social Media? Protests Versus Surveillance and Propaganda. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1): 117-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.1.117

Reporters Without Borders. 2020. RSF unveils 20/2020 list of press freedom’s digital predators. Available from: https://rsf.org/en/rsf-unveils-202020-list-press-freedom-s-digital-predators [23 October 2022].

Sinkkonen, E. & Lassila, J. 2022. Digital Authoritarianism and Technological Cooperation in Sino-Russian Relations: Common Goals and Diverging Standpoints. In S. Kirchberger, S. Sinjen & N. Wörmer (eds.), Russia-China Relations Global Power Shift, Cham: Springer, рр. 165-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97012-3_9

Wijayanto, W., Setiyono, B., Martini, R. & Nindya Elsitra, G. 2022. Digital Authoritarianism in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Social and Political Enquiries, ICISPE 2021, 14-15 September 2021, Semarang, Indonesia. Available from: https://eudl.eu/pdf/10.4108/eai.14-9-2021.2321400 [6 October 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.14-9-2021.2321400