War Media Reports as a Tool to Counteract in the Media Warfare

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2019.40.93-100

Abstract

In todayʼs information and communication world, information and communication are turning into a non-military means of aggressive influence, and the mass media are becoming a tool of powerful destructive impact in the media warfare, which continues unofficially even in peaceful conditions. Media are capable of disorganizing, disorienting, misinforming, maladapting an object of influence, disrupting his/her mental health, prompting spontaneous, unmotivated, aggressive actions, causing temporary or irreversible changes and self-destruction, subduing his/her consciousness and personality. However, along with the destructive potential of the media, the ideas of peace, tolerance, and peacekeeping rather than the ideas of war can and should be promoted. The article analyzes the ethical requirements for war media reports and the activity of journalists in the war zone. The author believes that in conflict zones, reporters should be guided by the same principles as the work of humanitarian organizations, since correspondents must also stand up for the interests of the victims (whether military or civilian). Their main mission is to disseminate objective information, not to escalate conflict and enmity, but to work for society, to unite citizens around common values.

Keywords: media warfare, war media reports, journalists, information, «hate speech».

Author Biography

Nataliia Karpchuk, Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University

Doctor of Political Science, Professor of the Department of International Communication and Political Analysis

References

1.               Buromenʹskiy, M., Shturkhetsʹkiy, S. ta in. (2016). Zhurnalistyka v umovakh konfliktu: peredoviy dosvid ta rekomendatsiyi: Posibnyk rekomendatsiy dlya pratsivnykiv ZMI, Kyiv, «Kompaniya VAITE», 118 s., URL: https://www.osce.org/uk/ukraine/254531?.
2.               Holub, O. (2016). Mediakompas: putivnyk profesiynoho zhurnalista. Praktychniy posibnyk, Instytut masovoyi informatsiyi, Kyyiv, TOV «Sofiya-A», 184 s. (s. 72), URL: https://imi.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Mediakompas.pdf.
3.               Dodatkoviy protokol do Zhenevsʹkykh konventsiy vid 12 serpnya 1949 roku, shcho stosuyetʹsya zakhystu zhertv mizhnarodnykh zbroynykh konfliktiv (Protokol I), vid 8 chervnya 1977 roku (1977), URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_199.
4.               Dorosh, M. (2014). Zhurnalisty v zoni ATO. Praktychniy poradnyk, Media Sapiens, 8 serpnya, URL: https://ms.detector.media/mediaprosvita/how_to/zhurnalisti_v_zoni_ato_praktichniy poradnik/.
5.               Ekspertna otsinka: Viyna u media ta media viyna. Pres-reliz (2016). Mizhnarodniy fond «Vidrodzhennya», URL: http://www.aup.com.ua/uploads/pr-war-ua.pdf.
6.               Zhenevsʹka konventsiya pro povodzhennya z viysʹkovopolonenymy (1949), URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_153 7.
7.               Zemlyana, I. (2017). Malymy krokamy. Yak pratsyuyutʹ zhurnalisty na Skhodi Ukrayiny, Instytut masovoyi informatsiyi, 27.07, URL: https://imi.org.ua/articles/malymy-krokamy-yak-pratsyuyut-zhurnalisty-na-chodi-ukrajiny-i111.
8.               Kulyas, I. (2014). Standarty i etyka zhurnalistyky v umovakh neoholoshenoyi viyny, Media Sapiens 29 zhovtnya, URL: https://ms.detector.media/ethics/standards/standarti_y_etika_zhurnalistiki_ v_umovakh_neogoloshenoi_viyni/.
9.               Leshchenko, O. (2016). «Hibrydna viyna» yak naukoviy konstrukt: problemy poshuku terminolohichnoyi ta kontseptualʹnoyi sutnosti, Visnyk Dnipropetrovsʹkoho universytetu, № 6, s. 60-71, URL: https://visnukpfs.dp.ua/index.php/PFS/article/view/853/1266 10.
10.           Lutsʹ, V. (2015). Mediaviyna (mediaprotystoyannya), Novitnya politychna leksyka (neolohizmy, okazionalizmy ta inshi novotvory), Lʹviv, Noviy svit-2000, s. 214-215.
11.           Merzlyuk, Yu. (2015). Viysʹkova zhurnalistyka: vid voyennoho korespondenta do strimera, Scientific Social Community, URL: https://www.science-community.org/uk/node/155965.
12.           Nesteryak , Yu. (2002). Derzhavna pidtrymka ZMI: yevropeysʹki tradytsiyi ta ukrayinsʹka praktyka, Visnyk Kyivsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu. Zhurnalistyka, № 10, s. 50–52.
13.           Pocheptsov, H. (2017). Chelovecheskoye izmereniye hibridnykh i diffuznykh voin, Media Sapiens, 5.11, URL: http://www.osvita.mediasapiens.ua/trends/1411978127/chelovecheskoe_izmerenie_gibridnykh_i_diffuznykh_voyn/.
14.           Bratic, V. (2006). Examining peace-oriented media in areas of violent conflict, URL: https://www.sfcg.org/Documents/DME/bratic_peace_oriented_media.pdf.
15.           Parvar, H. Z. (2004). Soft War (2): Media War, Tehran International Studies & Research Institute (TISRI), September, Tehran:, 303 p. URL: http://www.iranreview.org/content/Documents/Soft_War_2_Media_War.htm
16.           Payne, K. (2005) The Media as an Instrument of War. URL: http://media.leeds.ac.uk/papers/pmt/exhibits/2229/payne.pdf.
17.           What are Humanitarian Principles? (2012), UN OCHA, URL: https://www.unocha.org/sites/dms/Documents/OOM-humanitarianprinciples_eng_June12.pdf.

Published

2019-12-15

How to Cite

Karpchuk, N. (2019). War Media Reports as a Tool to Counteract in the Media Warfare. Modern Historical and Political Issues, (40), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2019.40.93-100