The US Foreign Policy towards Eastern Europe: State of the Field

Authors

  • Oleh Kozachuk Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University
  • Grigore Vasilescu Moldova State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2021.43.40-46

Keywords:

state of the field, the United States, foreign policy, international relations, Eastern Europe, Eastern Partnership, Ukraine

Abstract

The US foreign policy towards Eastern European countries, especially those that are members of the Eastern Partnership, is poorly understood. Therefore, the analysis of recent works (monographs and scientific articles published in peer-reviewed journals) is necessary to write further research and increase Washington’s interest in the region. This paper aims to familiarize scholars with recent researches and help them evaluate the existing scholarship in the field. A systematic approach was used to filter the publications in the field. After 2014, very few scientific publications focused on the role and place of the United States concerning Eastern Europe. The most significant publications are singled out, the conclusions and summary of researches are offered for acquaintance. It is concluded that scholars do not widely cover the US policy towards Europe and individual states in Eastern Europe. We assume that more researches are being done in this area, but they are not published in peer-reviewed journals.

Author Biographies

Oleh Kozachuk, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

Doctor of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of International Relations

Grigore Vasilescu, Moldova State University

Doctor Habilitatus in Philosophy, Professor, Department of International Relations, Director at the Center for European Studies

References

Bandeira, LAM (2019), The World Disorder: US Hegemony, Proxy Wars, Terrorism and Humanitarian Catastrophes, Springer International Publishing, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03204-3.

Birchfield, V.L. and Young, A.R. (Eds.). (2018), Triangular Diplomacy Among the United States, the European Union, and the Russian Federation: Responses to the Crisis in Ukraine, available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN= 1595521 (accessed 10 April 2021).

Charokopos, M. (2020), “Energy as an issue area in the European Union and the United States foreign policy-making: oscillating between independence and interdependence”, Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 24–44.

Gravelle, T.B., Reifler, J. and Scotto, T.J. (2017), “The structure of foreign policy attitudes in transatlantic perspective: Comparing the United States, United Kingdom, France and Germany”, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 56 No. 4, pp. 757–776.

Hadj Abdou, L. (2020), “‘Push or pull’? Framing immigration in times of crisis in the European Union and the United States”, Journal of European Integration, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 643–658.

Henriksen, T. (2017), Cycles in US Foreign Policy since the Cold War, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, NY.

Hlaváček, P. (2018), “New Security Strategy and Contemporary Paradigm of US Foreign Policy”, Obrana a Strategie (Defence and Strategy), Vol. 2018 No. 2, pp. 57–70.

Ilowski, P. (2019), “Populism and International Relations. Comparison of the United States and Central and Eastern Europe”, Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 49–67.

Jakstaite, G. (2019), “The US Foreign Policy Towards The Baltic States: The Implications Of Ukraine Crisis”, Journal on Baltic Security, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 27–39.

Kupiecki, R. (2016), “The Poland-United States Security Relations in the light of Asymmetry Theory”, Przegląd Strategiczny, No. 9, p. 31-48.

Kurzcz, M. (2020), “Hungary-United States Relations under Obama and Trump Administration”, Politické Vedy, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 98–113.

Porter, P. (2018), “Why America’s Grand Strategy Has Not Changed: Power, Habit, and the US Foreign Policy Establishment”, International Security, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 9–46.

Rehman, I. (2017), “Rise of the Reactionaries: The American Far Right and US Foreign Policy”, The Washington Quarterly, Routledge, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 29–48.

Schultz, K.A. (2017), “Perils of Polarization for US Foreign Policy”, The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 7–28.

Siroky, D.S., Simmons, A.J. and Gvalia, G. (2017), “Vodka or Bourbon? Foreign Policy Preferences Toward Russia and the United States in Georgia”, Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 500–518.

Vereshchuk, I. and Umland, A. (2019), “How to Make Eastern Europe’s Gray Zone Less Gray: The United States’ Baltic and Adriatic Charters Could Become Templates for Embedding Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova, and Azerbaijan in a Provisional Multilateral Security Structure”, Harvard International Review, Harvard International Relations Council, Inc, Vol. 40 No. 1, p. 38-41.

Wæver, O. (2018), “A Post-Western Europe: Strange Identities in a Less Liberal World Order”, Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 75–88.

Zachara, M. (2018), “Techno-Transatlantic Science and Technology in Relations Between the United States and Europe”, Ad Americam, Vol. 18, pp. 89–106.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-15

How to Cite

Kozachuk, O., & Vasilescu, G. (2021). The US Foreign Policy towards Eastern Europe: State of the Field. Modern Historical and Political Issues, (43), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.31861/mhpi2021.43.40-46